http://www.bilgiustam.com/?p=104
I was looking for more benchmarks on the turkish site and found this:
Great news for those, who thought their computer might not take Crysis very well!
I wonder how well it'll run on my rig.
How about u post a link that actually works?
tell us what was the results please...
Link and image does not work. Tell the results anyways.
oh talk about teaser
| Quote : oh talk about teaser |
You can say that again...
Ah damn. Sorry, I can't find the page any more. I'll see if I can get the image from browser cache.
edit: Sure enough.
http://img215.imageshack.us/img215 [...] st1kr1.jpg
riigghhhttttt
well...funny how they both match up
http://www.bilgiustam.com/resimler/donanim/test2.jpg
and
http://img215.imageshack.us/img215 [...] st1kr1.jpg
though the cards are waaaaay different
fake yet again
| Quote : fake yet again |
No kiddin'?
Seriously though, it could be correct. I'm just delivering the news here.
| Quote :
|
noo chance
The OP is starting this thread only to continue a useless argument from another thread.
http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware/2900XT-8800GTX-Crysis-demo-benchftopic-232492-days0-orderasc-125.html
He is upset that someone linked to benchmarks though they could be fake. The OP in that thread actually linked to a sight but in this case RTSa is actually making this up with the intention of misleading. He in some strange way believes this proves his point.
RTSa probably will never understand the difference because he appears to be incapable of reason.
I ask you again RTSa:
| Quote : A lot of websites linked to these benches. Bullarh simply passed the info on to others who read this forum and provided the link. We all know that they could be fake but that is not Bullarh's problem. Does everyone participating in this forum have to validate all links?
|
| Quote : Does everyone participating in this forum have to validate all links? |
No, of course not. Why should I have to do that, then?
Did it ever occur to you that perhaps I'm telling the truth? Perhaps there was an article on the turkish site that had that bench picture, which I posted here. Perhaps they posted that first, but removed it since the one with 8800GTX and 2900XT was better, since it's the first Crysis bench, but also a bench for the R600.
Also, why the fuck do people type my name RTSa, when it's clearly RTsa? :?
Very Funny.
| Quote : fake yet again |
No kiddin'?
Seriously though, it could be correct. I'm just delivering the news here.
There's no way the 7800GT could keep up with the X1900XT like that.
Sweet! So there's a chance my S3 Virge 3D is gonna be able to handle Crysis!
Sure it could, if the game is favourable to NVIDIA.
| Quote : Sure it could, if the game is favourable to NVIDIA. |
You're nuts; "The way it's meant to be played" is nothing more than a marketing gimmick, and has nothing to do with performance. If the 7800GT can't keep up with any game out now, what makes you think it'll be able to do it in a more complex environment?
The game's not optimized yet. You know just as well as I do that some games run better on NVIDIA cards while other games run better on ATI cards. Why else would a card lose in one game and win in another?
example:
7800GTX vs 1800XT in Oblivion
7800GTX vs 1800XT in HL2:Episode 1
As you can see, the difference can be HUGE.
| Quote : Sure it could, if the game is favourable to NVIDIA. |
You're nuts; "The way it's meant to be played" is nothing more than a marketing gimmick, and has nothing to do with performance. If the 7800GT can't keep up with any game out now, what makes you think it'll be able to do it in a more complex environment?Why do you think they call them Nvidiots???
Nice one, Nvidiots! Hah, hilarious..
You totally ignore the links I posted. Good job!
This is pretty funny.
People are getting worked up about a game that has not been officially benchmarked nor released. In the end either the PC will be able to play Crysis at an acceptable level or it will not.
For those who think their system will be too slow, you might as well start saving up money. If it turns out that once Crysis has been officially benchmarked and will indeed require an "uber" PC, then you got the money to go on a shopping spree. However, if your PC is good enough, then congratulations, you don't need to upgrade unless you want to.
For those kids who don't have a job and can't convince their parents to upgrade the PC, well then tough luck. You'll just have to wait and see if your PC can handle it.
I would like to play Crysis, but I'm not going to loose sleep wondering if my E6600 and X1900XT 512MB can handle it.
| Quote : The game's not optimized yet. You know just as well as I do that some games run better on NVIDIA cards while other games run better on ATI cards. Why else would a card lose in one game and win in another?
|
1) Toms VGA charts are rarely accurate
2) That was a 7800GTX, not a 7800GT
3) The engine used in Oblivion is far richer feature set than the Source engine, and would be a much more accurate representation of how Crysis will perform under Direct X9.
I'm sure the 7800GT could probably handle Crysis with no problems...
as long as you play 640x480 or 800x600.
-TyShoe
I think if youre a 7800gt owner and are planning on running crysis, yep youll be having a crisis all right
nice
| Quote : The game's not optimized yet. You know just as well as I do that some games run better on NVIDIA cards while other games run better on ATI cards. Why else would a card lose in one game and win in another?
|
1) Toms VGA charts are rarely accurate
2) That was a 7800GTX, not a 7800GT
3) The engine used in Oblivion is far richer feature set than the Source engine, and would be a much more accurate representation of how Crysis will perform under Direct X9.You obviously completely missed my point, which was that cards from the two companies perform very differently in different games. In one game, the NVIDIA card could win by a whole lot, while in the other it could be crushed to pieces by the same ATI card it just beat up.
I know I didn't have the same cards as in the benchmark, but my links show & prove the point. As for the charts being accurate or not - no comment.
little boys should not try to post in adult forums. you had a piss poor argument in the other thread and you are showing yourself to be an ass here.
just leave, you have nothing to contribute.
| Quote : riigghhhttttt
|
OWNED!!!
| Quote : Sure it could, if the game is favourable to NVIDIA. |
You're nuts; "The way it's meant to be played" is nothing more than a marketing gimmick, and has nothing to do with performance. If the 7800GT can't keep up with any game out now, what makes you think it'll be able to do it in a more complex environment?
agree there...
infact, a lot of games that sports the "the way its meant to be played" runs faster on ati cards o_O
| Quote :
|
You have proved nothing. The 7800GTX and the X1800XT are far closer in capability than the 7800GT and the X1900XT.
For fucks sake. You are incapable of coherent thought. Your logic fails.
It doesn't matter what the cards are. What my point is (which all of you seem to be missing here) is that while one card wins massively in some benchies, it could lose in another. It's as simple as that, but you fail to grasp a simple idea like that.
| Quote : For ****** sake. You are incapable of coherent thought. Your logic fails.
|
Look, youre all over the place. 1800 vs 78gtx, when its really (link provided by you) a 1900XT versus a measily 7800GT .In your own arguments, youre not even providing apples to apples. OGL does SOMETIMES favor nVidia cards, but not always. And even tho this can occur sometimes, it doesnt go beyond 2 refreshes AND a card nVidia couldnt best using a single card config UNTIL the 880gts. So please stop going in this direction
There's something really wrong in your brain...when the fuck did I say the links have the same cards as in the Crysis bench? In fact, where the fuck did anyone say that?
The links to VGA charts simply prove the point that sometimes a card might beat the crap out of another while in another game it could be the other way around. You even quoted that in your post, but apparently you didn't read it - or perhaps you just didn't understand it.
| Quote : For ****** sake. You are incapable of coherent thought. Your logic fails.
|
Wrong again.
If 2 different architecture cards are similar in performance generally, a game that favours either architecture can show a big difference in benchmarks.
But if you take 2 different architecture cards that are hugely different in performance the likelihood of the weaker card in any benchmark beating the stronger card is very low.
Your example simply doesn't support your argument, simple as that.
There are 573 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

