Word :    Username :           
 

Why does MS recommend inserting configering a network server as a gateway when deploying a single server on a small network.

I understand that any network connected to the internet needs a strong firewall, but MS recommends making the server a gateway even if there is also a hardware firewall in the network.

This configuration seems like overkill, so I am curious why MS insists this is the prefered configuration on a small one server network.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

allows you to do other traffic shaping measures // proxying etc -- things that a firewall // hardware router will not be able to do.

Reply to Buzzons

Thanks for the response

Reply to Busto963

Buzzons is correct. But if you get a good enough firewall\router you can do even more than what MS offers. It all depends on how much you want to spend.

Best of luck.

Reply to lvdax

I just installed a SUSE Linux server on an old work station - really overkill for my needs, so I justify it as a learning experience. But in the course of my studying, I looked at a couple of books targeted at MS SBS Server 2003 R@, and that is why I asked!

Reply to Busto963
Tom's Hardware > Forum > General Networking > General Gateways, Routers and Firewalls > Server as a gateway - why?
Go to:

There are 700 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them