John Navas - Does Cingular pay you?

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

What is the amount of money that Cingular pays you,
John Navas?


The reason for the question is obvious.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <EeYBd.7272$JC2.1450@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote:

> What is the amount of money that Cingular pays you,
> John Navas?
>
>
> The reason for the question is obvious.

He just takes blowjobs from the streetcorner dealers.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <EeYBd.7272$JC2.1450@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net> on Sun, 02 Jan 2005
19:48:52 GMT, "torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote:

>What is the amount of money that Cingular pays you,
>John Navas?

Zero. I have no connection to Cingular (or any other cellular company) other
than as a customer.

>The reason for the question is obvious.

Not to me.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <ru_Bd.16151$_3.188176@typhoon.sonic.net>,
John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> >The reason for the question is obvious.
>
> Not to me.

Which tells all, John. Which tells all.

You're oblivious.

 

[user]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:20:20 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:

>He just takes blowjobs from the streetcorner dealers.

Not helpful ... actually less than worthless and quit immature. If
you can't play nice, then take your ball and go home.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <et6ht0hnbr11f539rbeof2hp5nane1hkk5@4ax.com>,
"<----- Which Way? ----->" <traxless@less.com> wrote:

> Not helpful ... actually less than worthless and quit immature. If
> you can't play nice, then take your ball and go home.

Will you tell that to Navas next time he posts immature insults to
someone he disagrees with, or more likely has proven him wrong?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:ru_Bd.16151$_3.188176@typhoon.sonic.net...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <EeYBd.7272$JC2.1450@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net> on Sun, 02 Jan
> 2005
> 19:48:52 GMT, "torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>What is the amount of money that Cingular pays you,
>>John Navas?
>
> Zero. I have no connection to Cingular (or any other cellular company)
> other
> than as a customer.
>
>>The reason for the question is obvious.
>
> Not to me.
>
> --
> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <tB1Cd.12036$qf5.10533@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > Zero. I have no connection to Cingular (or any other cellular company)
> > other
> > than as a customer.
> >
> >>The reason for the question is obvious.
> >
> > Not to me.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> > John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
>
> So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?

In the same manner that Al Qaeda believes in what they do. Yes.

In other words, you'll never stop him.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <elmop-584210.17531602012005@text.usenetserver.com> on Sun, 02 Jan 2005
17:53:16 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:

>In article <ru_Bd.16151$_3.188176@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> >The reason for the question is obvious.
>>
>> Not to me.
>
>Which tells all, John. Which tells all.

Indeed.

>You're oblivious.

Backwards again.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <tB1Cd.12036$qf5.10533@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net> on Mon, 03 Jan
2005 01:54:33 GMT, "torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote:

>So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?

I do. Takes a fair amount of work to create a newsgroup like this. And you?

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

I have found Mr Navas's posts to be very helpfull and informative. Unlike
the very uninfomative and head in the sewer comments made by others. The
idea that someone just likes to be helpfull is lost on a lot of the younger
generation.
"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:ru_Bd.16151$_3.188176@typhoon.sonic.net...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <EeYBd.7272$JC2.1450@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net> on Sun, 02 Jan
2005
> 19:48:52 GMT, "torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >What is the amount of money that Cingular pays you,
> >John Navas?
>
> Zero. I have no connection to Cingular (or any other cellular company)
other
> than as a customer.
>
> >The reason for the question is obvious.
>
> Not to me.
>
> --
> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <%gbCd.12235$qf5.5474@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"Leo Curran" <gardenapartments@earthlink.net> wrote:

> I have found Mr Navas's posts to be very helpfull and informative. Unlike
> the very uninfomative and head in the sewer comments made by others. The
> idea that someone just likes to be helpfull is lost on a lot of the younger
> generation.

So you ignore his posts where he omits URLs, or insults others?

 

[Someone]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:55:23 GMT, Leo Curran wrote:

>I have found Mr Navas's posts to be very helpfull and informative. Unlike
>the very uninfomative and head in the sewer comments made by others. The
>idea that someone just likes to be helpfull is lost on a lot of the younger
>generation.

I have found *some* of his posts helpful too. At times, however, he is
arrogant and places himself out there as the be-all, end-all. While he
admits not being affiliated with Cingular, occasionally citing that
he's only a customer, he paints a picture of himself as the ultimate
cellular guru, quite often speaking as if he single-handedly founded
Cingular. When I started reading through this group several months
ago, I initially wondered why so many were "picking on him." The
reason is now quite obvious.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <10tj9imkjj4vode@corp.supernews.com>,
John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> >So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?
>
> I do. Takes a fair amount of work to create a newsgroup like this.

Tell us (a) how many hours you spent doing so, and (b) when that was.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <elmop-1F205A.15350503012005@text.usenetserver.com> on Mon, 03 Jan 2005
15:35:05 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:

>In article <10tj9imkjj4vode@corp.supernews.com>,
> John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> >So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?
>>
>> I do. Takes a fair amount of work to create a newsgroup like this.
>
>Tell us (a) how many hours you spent doing so, and (b) when that was.

Why?

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[chelsea]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.verizon, alt.cellular, alt.cellular.motorola, alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

Winnie the Pooh started alt.cellular.verizon, and she says it took all
of the time to take the cookies out of the oven.

Who started the other "cellular" groups?

Starting a group is like smacking a fool in the face, it takes no time
at all!

Cheers!

ps: John Navas needs a real job and to get off of his knees in servile
submission to the cell phone dynasties. Or to get some knee pads and
find a few hobbies so he does not irritate so many other posters with
his poppycock.

Maybe he could go into business with Scott Stephenson, say earplugs or
something, for monks in Tibet? Or janitor at the US State Department,
or call taker for one of the cell phone customer service centers
outsourced to India.

JohnF wrote:
> "John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
> news:10tjbl694hk2nf5@corp.supernews.com...
> > [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
> >
> > In <elmop-1F205A.15350503012005@text.usenetserver.com> on Mon, 03
Jan 2005
> > 15:35:05 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
> >
> > >In article <10tj9imkjj4vode@corp.supernews.com>,
> > > John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> >So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?
> > >>
> > >> I do. Takes a fair amount of work to create a newsgroup like
this.
> > >
> > >Tell us (a) how many hours you spent doing so, and (b) when that
was.
> >
> > Why?
>
> Because you claim it takes so much time. Even if you did in fact
"create"
> this newsgroup you act as though someone else wouldn't have come up
wit
> hthis unique idea if you hadn't done it. Since you're patting
yourself on
> the back so hard please explain how much time it takes and what's
involved
> with "creating a newsgroup". I'm very interested.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <0lmit0huiarfvmgat8jvn2dlr9uhl3pogj@4ax.com>,
Someone <someone@somewhere.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:55:23 GMT, Leo Curran wrote:
>
> >I have found Mr Navas's posts to be very helpfull and informative. Unlike
> >the very uninfomative and head in the sewer comments made by others. The
> >idea that someone just likes to be helpfull is lost on a lot of the younger
> >generation.
>
> I have found *some* of his posts helpful too. At times, however, he is
> arrogant and places himself out there as the be-all, end-all. While he
> admits not being affiliated with Cingular, occasionally citing that
> he's only a customer, he paints a picture of himself as the ultimate
> cellular guru, quite often speaking as if he single-handedly founded
> Cingular. When I started reading through this group several months
> ago, I initially wondered why so many were "picking on him." The
> reason is now quite obvious.

Exactly. He is to be commended for founding this newsgroup, but he still
thinks he can run it and control it, when as an unmoderated newsgroup,
nothing is further from the truth.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <jzwick3-A3AF96.09471503012005@news1.west.earthlink.net> on Mon, 03 Jan
2005 15:48:42 GMT, Jack Zwick <jzwick3@mindspring.com> wrote:

>[John] is to be commended for founding this newsgroup, but he still
>thinks he can run it and control it, when as an unmoderated newsgroup,
>nothing is further from the truth.

Case in point: your behavior.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.verizon,alt.cellular,alt.cellular.motorola,alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

"CHELSEA" <chelsea_57@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1104795946.784029.18290@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Winnie the Pooh started alt.cellular.verizon, and she says it took all
> of the time to take the cookies out of the oven.
>
> Who started the other "cellular" groups?
>
> Starting a group is like smacking a fool in the face, it takes no time
> at all!
>
> Cheers!
>
> ps: John Navas needs a real job and to get off of his knees in servile
> submission to the cell phone dynasties. Or to get some knee pads and
> find a few hobbies so he does not irritate so many other posters with
> his poppycock.
>
> Maybe he could go into business with Scott Stephenson, say earplugs or
> something, for monks in Tibet? Or janitor at the US State Department,
> or call taker for one of the cell phone customer service centers
> outsourced to India.
>

No thanks- unlike you, I'm actually quite happy with my life, and don't find
the need to whine, bitch and moan about the great injustices piled on me by
the bullies of the world. In other words- I have control of my life. Try
it some time.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <10tjbl694hk2nf5@corp.supernews.com>,
John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> >Tell us (a) how many hours you spent doing so, and (b) when that was.
>
> Why?

Context.

You made it sound like you spend lots of your time making the newsgroup
work--when you don't.

No, you spent a few hours a long time ago, and yet you're trying to milk
that for sympathy.

In the words of so many great ones: what have you done for me *lately*?

Nothing.

 

[johnf]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:10tjbl694hk2nf5@corp.supernews.com...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <elmop-1F205A.15350503012005@text.usenetserver.com> on Mon, 03 Jan 2005
> 15:35:05 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <10tj9imkjj4vode@corp.supernews.com>,
> > John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?
> >>
> >> I do. Takes a fair amount of work to create a newsgroup like this.
> >
> >Tell us (a) how many hours you spent doing so, and (b) when that was.
>
> Why?

Because you claim it takes so much time. Even if you did in fact "create"
this newsgroup you act as though someone else wouldn't have come up wit
hthis unique idea if you hadn't done it. Since you're patting yourself on
the back so hard please explain how much time it takes and what's involved
with "creating a newsgroup". I'm very interested.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <CLjCd.63740$uM5.47317@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> on Mon, 03 Jan
2005 22:34:10 GMT, "JohnF" <u8721@yahoo.com> wrote:

>"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>news:10tjbl694hk2nf5@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> In <elmop-1F205A.15350503012005@text.usenetserver.com> on Mon, 03 Jan 2005
>> 15:35:05 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <10tj9imkjj4vode@corp.supernews.com>,
>> > John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> >So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?
>> >>
>> >> I do. Takes a fair amount of work to create a newsgroup like this.
>> >
>> >Tell us (a) how many hours you spent doing so, and (b) when that was.
>>
>> Why?
>
>Because you claim it takes so much time.

How would it be any more meaningful that what I've already said?

>Even if you did in fact "create"
>this newsgroup

I did. Check if you don't believe me.

>you act as though someone else wouldn't have come up wit
>hthis unique idea if you hadn't done it.

Nobody else had. Talk is cheap. Have you ever created a newsgroup? Have you
any idea what's involved? Get some experience before you presume to deprecate
others (unless you just enjoy making yourself look petty).

>Since you're patting yourself on
>the back so hard

I did nothing of the kind. I simply stated a fact for the benefit of those
(like you) that were unaware of it.

>please explain how much time it takes and what's involved
>with "creating a newsgroup". I'm very interested.

See:
http://www.visi.com/~barr/alt-creation-guide.html
http://nylon.net/alt/newgroup.htm
http://www.gweep.ca/~edmonds/usenet/good-newgroup.html

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <jSlCd.16325$_3.190582@typhoon.sonic.net>,
John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> >you act as though someone else wouldn't have come up wit
> >hthis unique idea if you hadn't done it.
>
> Nobody else had. Talk is cheap. Have you ever created a newsgroup? Have you
> any idea what's involved?

Since you won't tell us.....probably because there's about zero effort
involved, especially nowadays.....and your showing zero effort would
show you to be the blowhard you are, for the world to see...

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.verizon,alt.cellular,alt.cellular.motorola,alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <1104795946.784029.18290@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> on 3 Jan 2005
15:45:46 -0800, "CHELSEA" <chelsea_57@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Winnie the Pooh started alt.cellular.verizon, and she says it took all
>of the time to take the cookies out of the oven.
>
>Who started the other "cellular" groups?
>
>Starting a group is like smacking a fool in the face, it takes no time
>at all!

How many successful newsgroups have you created? Or are you just shooting off
your mouth? ;-)

The hard part is not in creating an alt newsgroup, but in doing it right.
alt.cellular.cingular was successful from the beginning because I followed
proper procedures and persuaded major news providers to carry it.

>ps: John Navas needs a real job ...

I have a real job. You need some real manners (unless you enjoy making
yourself look childish).


>JohnF wrote:
>> "John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>> news:10tjbl694hk2nf5@corp.supernews.com...
>> > [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>> >
>> > In <elmop-1F205A.15350503012005@text.usenetserver.com> on Mon, 03
>Jan 2005
>> > 15:35:05 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >In article <10tj9imkjj4vode@corp.supernews.com>,
>> > > John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> >So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?
>> > >>
>> > >> I do. Takes a fair amount of work to create a newsgroup like
>this.
>> > >
>> > >Tell us (a) how many hours you spent doing so, and (b) when that
>was.
>> >
>> > Why?
>>
>> Because you claim it takes so much time. Even if you did in fact
>"create"
>> this newsgroup you act as though someone else wouldn't have come up
>wit
>> hthis unique idea if you hadn't done it. Since you're patting
>yourself on
>> the back so hard please explain how much time it takes and what's
>involved
>> with "creating a newsgroup". I'm very interested.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[john]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.verizon,alt.cellular,alt.cellular.motorola,alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

John Navas wrote:
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <1104795946.784029.18290@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> on 3 Jan 2005
> 15:45:46 -0800, "CHELSEA" <chelsea_57@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Winnie the Pooh started alt.cellular.verizon, and she says it took all
>>of the time to take the cookies out of the oven.
>>
>>Who started the other "cellular" groups?
>>
>>Starting a group is like smacking a fool in the face, it takes no time
>>at all!
>
>
> How many successful newsgroups have you created? Or are you just shooting off
> your mouth? ;-)
>
> The hard part is not in creating an alt newsgroup, but in doing it right.
> alt.cellular.cingular was successful from the beginning because I followed
> proper procedures and persuaded major news providers to carry it.
>
>
>>ps: John Navas needs a real job ...
>
>
> I have a real job. You need some real manners (unless you enjoy making
> yourself look childish).
>



I see SMARTASS John Navas is still acting like a jerk on yet ANOTHER
newsgroup. His reputation from comp.dcom.modems still carries on.