My AMD X2 5000+ CPU rates a 2.1 because of the Asus M2NPV-VM motherboard onboard GeForce6150 graphics. Considering that I am playing games at the same fps or faster than on my XP PC, I don't think I will worry about it. It looks like their hardware rating is bogus and possibly slanted towards certain devices. I would like Toms to figure out if they use a featurelist, a manufacturer list, a driver list or a real test.
I was just messing around with this Unknown Device with no manufacturer or hardware information listed for it that I have had since day 1 and couldn't figure out what it was. I found a website that allowed for a trial scan of my compute for driver updates. It determined that it was for an iMON USB device from Sound Graphics. I don't have anything like that on my system. I installed the driver, which Vista somehow had related to my PPC6700 phone docking station (which was already syncing correctly so I have no idea what it did). My graphic card peformance suddenly went from 2.1 to 2.4. Huh? This is a driver not graphic peformance related in any way. For whatever reason, now I sit at 2.4 because the performance is based on your lowest score. The totals: CPU:5.2,RAM:5.9,Graphics:4.6,Gaming:2.4,HDisk:5.6. Yeah, this perf rating thingy is a crock.
I was just messing around with this Unknown Device with no manufacturer or hardware information listed for it that I have had since day 1 and couldn't figure out what it was. I found a website that allowed for a trial scan of my compute for driver updates. It determined that it was for an iMON USB device from Sound Graphics. I don't have anything like that on my system. I installed the driver, which Vista somehow had related to my PPC6700 phone docking station (which was already syncing correctly so I have no idea what it did). My graphic card peformance suddenly went from 2.1 to 2.4. Huh? This is a driver not graphic peformance related in any way. For whatever reason, now I sit at 2.4 because the performance is based on your lowest score. The totals: CPU:5.2,RAM:5.9,Graphics:4.6,Gaming:2.4,HDisk:5.6. Yeah, this perf rating thingy is a crock.
Do you have a Sound Blaster sound card? If so, it is probably related to that, it is a driver issue.
My C2D (E6600) was 5.3 rating stock settings. OC'ing it up from 1066 FSB to 1333 FSB took the rating up to 5.7. Rest of the system is showing 5.9
E6600 - OC'd from 1066 FSB to 1333 FSB
Antec 900 Case w/ Cooler Master Real Power Pro 850w
EVGA 680i w/ Zalman 9500 cooler
2 x 1 gig Corsair (DDR2 800)
1x EVGA 8800 GTX
X-Fi Gamer
2x Seagate 7200.10 320gig SATA II (Raid 0)
1x Seagate 7200.10 500gig SATA II (Raid 1)
1x Plextor DVD-RW SATA II
Vista Home Premium 32-bit
i only got a 4.8 cause of my 4300. and since its impossible to overclock on vista. atleast for a beginner like me. Cause i cant download the new bios or anything. and memory i got a 4.7 also. 2gb not enough for vista?
icant change my memory settings cause i cant upgrade my bios. Anyway i can load my new bios off of dos or soemthing? cause my new bios wont upgrade off vista 64
Im trhying to play company of heros right now and with AA on i cant get any FPS at all under 5.
IS the AA being held back by my ram/cpu or by my 320mb 8800gts?
Component Details Subscore Base score
Processor Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4300 @ 1.80GHz - 5.8
Memory (RAM) 2.0GB - 5.9 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS - 5.9 Gaming graphics 1372MB Total available graphics memory - 5.9 Primary hard disk 138.5GB Total - 5.9 Windows Vista (TM) Ultimate (build: 6.0.6000)
I read on an ASUS forum that Vista is not recognizing OC'd CPUs as fast as they should be but instead it looks at the base speed. Looking at this post, I am beginning to believe it.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.