Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows Vista > Vista General Discussion > POST YOUR VISTA PERFORMANCE RATING

POST YOUR VISTA PERFORMANCE RATING

Forum Windows Vista : Vista General Discussion - POST YOUR VISTA PERFORMANCE RATING

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Mine is 4.5 with my new labby... Core 2 Duo t2700 and x1700

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

My graphics card was the lowest ranked thing and put me at 3.9. Can't remember the other numbers off hand.

Reply to darious00777
- 0 +

Mine is 4.7, lowest score is my Pentium D 3Ghz

Reply to jaylil
- 0 +

Apparently mine is a 5.3 with my HDD and E6600 CPU being my lowest ratings. Graphics is 5.9 though hehe.

Reply to talan

My AMD X2 5000+ CPU rates a 2.1 because of the Asus M2NPV-VM motherboard onboard GeForce6150 graphics. Considering that I am playing games at the same fps or faster than on my XP PC, I don't think I will worry about it. It looks like their hardware rating is bogus and possibly slanted towards certain devices. I would like Toms to figure out if they use a featurelist, a manufacturer list, a driver list or a real test.

Reply to pkellmey

Theoretically I should be able to hit 6.0, but the test never lets me get past 5.8.

Reply to dasickninja

It'd be easier if they used an actual test then having a compiled list. A 5000+ getting a score like that though, it's just plain weird.

Reply to darious00777

I think mine was 5.0 or a little higher....

All of them were 5.9 (freaked me out) except for my HDD at 5.5 and my CPU at 5.0.

Reply to buckiller

I was just messing around with this Unknown Device with no manufacturer or hardware information listed for it that I have had since day 1 and couldn't figure out what it was. I found a website that allowed for a trial scan of my compute for driver updates. It determined that it was for an iMON USB device from Sound Graphics. I don't have anything like that on my system. I installed the driver, which Vista somehow had related to my PPC6700 phone docking station (which was already syncing correctly so I have no idea what it did). My graphic card peformance suddenly went from 2.1 to 2.4. Huh? This is a driver not graphic peformance related in any way. For whatever reason, now I sit at 2.4 because the performance is based on your lowest score. The totals: CPU:5.2,RAM:5.9,Graphics:4.6,Gaming:2.4,HDisk:5.6. Yeah, this perf rating thingy is a crock.

Reply to pkellmey
- 0 +

Quote :

I was just messing around with this Unknown Device with no manufacturer or hardware information listed for it that I have had since day 1 and couldn't figure out what it was. I found a website that allowed for a trial scan of my compute for driver updates. It determined that it was for an iMON USB device from Sound Graphics. I don't have anything like that on my system. I installed the driver, which Vista somehow had related to my PPC6700 phone docking station (which was already syncing correctly so I have no idea what it did). My graphic card peformance suddenly went from 2.1 to 2.4. Huh? This is a driver not graphic peformance related in any way. For whatever reason, now I sit at 2.4 because the performance is based on your lowest score. The totals: CPU:5.2,RAM:5.9,Graphics:4.6,Gaming:2.4,HDisk:5.6. Yeah, this perf rating thingy is a crock.


Do you have a Sound Blaster sound card? If so, it is probably related to that, it is a driver issue.

Reply to jayrm14

5.3

i assume thats pretty good. im happy.

Reply to pottymonster

4.2

idk whats the bottleneck

Reply to derek101700

5.0

My C2D 6400 is the bottleneck :roll:
I don't think the index uses a precompiled list because OCing my C2D gets me higher results. 5.2 was an easy one.

OTOH, I also had a 5.0 with my Pent D 945. Don't know why.

Here a screen of my last install with the Pent D.

http://hizo-fly.blogspot.com/2006/10/going-x64.html

4.4 because I did it on an old ATA hard drive.

Reply to The-Darkening

My C2D (E6600) was 5.3 rating stock settings. OC'ing it up from 1066 FSB to 1333 FSB took the rating up to 5.7. Rest of the system is showing 5.9

E6600 - OC'd from 1066 FSB to 1333 FSB
Antec 900 Case w/ Cooler Master Real Power Pro 850w
EVGA 680i w/ Zalman 9500 cooler
2 x 1 gig Corsair (DDR2 800)
1x EVGA 8800 GTX
X-Fi Gamer
2x Seagate 7200.10 320gig SATA II (Raid 0)
1x Seagate 7200.10 500gig SATA II (Raid 1)
1x Plextor DVD-RW SATA II
Vista Home Premium 32-bit

Reply to VGRoarke

Quote :

Do you have a Sound Blaster sound card? If so, it is probably related to that, it is a driver issue.


I'm using the SoundMax built onto the board - in no way related to graphics.

Reply to pkellmey

4.3 with
AMD 64 4000+
BFG Tech nforce4 Ultra
2x1GB PC3200 OCZ Platinum Series RAM
256MB BFG Tech 7800GTOC

Reply to danny9894
- 0 +

My ePen!s is 5.7

5.7 for my E6400 @ 3.2GHz and everything else is 5.9 (2G RAM, 7900GS, Atlas 15K II)

Reply to briank

i only got a 4.8 cause of my 4300. and since its impossible to overclock on vista. atleast for a beginner like me. Cause i cant download the new bios or anything. and memory i got a 4.7 also. 2gb not enough for vista?

everything else i got 5.9 with my 8800gts

Reply to mega1268

maybe not tight enough timings on the memory?

Mine is 2GB 2-3-2-5 1T I think.

Reply to buckiller

icant change my memory settings cause i cant upgrade my bios. Anyway i can load my new bios off of dos or soemthing? cause my new bios wont upgrade off vista 64

Im trhying to play company of heros right now and with AA on i cant get any FPS at all under 5.

IS the AA being held back by my ram/cpu or by my 320mb 8800gts?

Reply to mega1268

I'm at 4.1. Even with a better video card the score didn't go up.

Reply to islanddog

Quote :

and memory i got a 4.7 also. 2gb not enough for vista?


It's not as much the amount of ram as the speed/type of RAM. I have 2G, but it is DDR2-800 and I got a 5.9 for that.

Reply to pkellmey

i have 2gb of ddr800 also. i geuss the timings are bad. i dunno if im gonna clock taht any faster. not sure how to .

Reply to mega1268

http://www.shareyourscore.com/MyScore.aspx?scoreid=581

My Score: 5.8

Component Details Subscore Base score
Processor Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4300 @ 1.80GHz - 5.8

Memory (RAM) 2.0GB - 5.9
Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS - 5.9
Gaming graphics 1372MB Total available graphics memory - 5.9
Primary hard disk 138.5GB Total - 5.9
Windows Vista (TM) Ultimate (build: 6.0.6000)

Comments: E4300 Overclocked to 3.5Ghz

Reply to CheahaDR
- 0 +

4.7

AMD 64 X2 4400+
2GB GSkill Memory (what dragged me down in score)
74GB Raptor + more hard drives
X1950XT

Everything was in the mid to upper 5s except my memory. Don’t know what’s up with that!

Reply to maxxum

5.3... specs in sig.

Reply to tech4808

Quote :

Comments: E4300 Overclocked to 3.5Ghz


I read on an ASUS forum that Vista is not recognizing OC'd CPUs as fast as they should be but instead it looks at the base speed. Looking at this post, I am beginning to believe it.

Reply to pkellmey

Processor 5.1
Memory 5.4
Graphics 3.7
Gaming Graphics 3.6
Hard Disk 5.0

No OC, 533 memory, integrated graphics and a recycled 60GB IDE HD.

I can live with this until the mid range, single slot DX10 cards show up

Reply to barturtle

5.5

CPU (e6700, stock) and RAM (2GB Corsair pc6400 C4) scored 5.5.
The rest was 5.9

-dolynick

Reply to dolynick

5.0 'cuz my CPU.
Twas 4.6 before I OC'd. Everything else is 'round 5.9.
My rig in the sig.

Reply to TheProfiler
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows Vista > Vista General Discussion > POST YOUR VISTA PERFORMANCE RATING
Go to:

There are 549 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them