Hi,
I got a 2810sa card a while back to run RAID5 because I was fed up of having drives die on me. It is running with 4 WD5000YS drives right now. Firmware and drivers are the latest versions.
It was clear from the start that it was very slow, since when I dumped a 300GB drive's data onto the new RAID array, it took several times longer than I had estimated. So I ran HD Tach and it confirmed my fears. This result is 100% consistent, I get it no matter when I run the benchmark:
http://fedor.minglong.org/slowraid5.JPG
I thought it might be the PCI bus at first - too much competition for the limited bandwidth - but the results are far too consistent for that to be the case, and the burst speed shows that there is more bandwidth available at least at some points in time, which would mean that the graph should have peaks of 70mb/s+ here and there.
Does anyone have any ideas on what's going on? Frankly I don't mind it all that much - I got the 2810sa for cheap instead of the 2820sa which was current at the time not because I wanted speed but because I wanted data redundancy and in this respect I got what I paid for. Still, would be nice to see at least mediocre performance. Remember, the HD Tach benchmark is showing read speeds, which doesn't even require parity calculations.
Oh and background verification is off too.
I got a 2810sa card a while back to run RAID5 because I was fed up of having drives die on me. It is running with 4 WD5000YS drives right now. Firmware and drivers are the latest versions.
It was clear from the start that it was very slow, since when I dumped a 300GB drive's data onto the new RAID array, it took several times longer than I had estimated. So I ran HD Tach and it confirmed my fears. This result is 100% consistent, I get it no matter when I run the benchmark:
http://fedor.minglong.org/slowraid5.JPG
I thought it might be the PCI bus at first - too much competition for the limited bandwidth - but the results are far too consistent for that to be the case, and the burst speed shows that there is more bandwidth available at least at some points in time, which would mean that the graph should have peaks of 70mb/s+ here and there.
Does anyone have any ideas on what's going on? Frankly I don't mind it all that much - I got the 2810sa for cheap instead of the 2820sa which was current at the time not because I wanted speed but because I wanted data redundancy and in this respect I got what I paid for. Still, would be nice to see at least mediocre performance. Remember, the HD Tach benchmark is showing read speeds, which doesn't even require parity calculations.
Oh and background verification is off too.