(S939 X2 3800+) Manchester or Toledo??

[trinitron64]

I asked a question on here a couple of days ago regarding the choice between the single core 4000+ or dual core 3800+

Now what I would like to know is which core is better for overclocking, perferably with minimal voltage.

Toledo which has half of its L2 cache disabled, but was featured in FX-60

or

The newer Manchester core which should have a smaller core because it was built with 512kb of cache.

So which should clock further... the E4 Toledo... or the E6 Manchester?

 

[Gary_Busey]

This is something I want to know too. I might be getting a 3800+, but I have no idea what the difference is between cores.

 

[amdwilliam1985]

I know toledo cores are good, a lot of dual-core opterons were based on toledo cores in socket 939.
opterons are built for server environment with extra stablity, so in my opinion toledo is the way to go.

 

[SPARTAN-117]

Theres a THG article on the 3800+ Manchester and its supposed to go to 2.8 or 3ghz on aftermarket air.

http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/08/01/dual/

Gotta scourer the web for 3ghz 64X2 Manchesters, but its the OC king in this ring.

 

[ajfink]

Manchester. The Toledo has half its cache disabled (Toledo = 1MB per core), which means it probably will be slot less efficient in terms of heat, rather than the Manchester, which only has 512KB per core to begin with.

 

[smartel7070]

Cool ! I just bought a manchester

 

[HA_ZEE]

Trying to find something I read a long time ago about overclocking these two CPU's. They seemed to indicate that one of them (the Toledo I think) scales better when overclocked.....will continue looking.