This has to be the most poorly replied to message I think I've ever seen here on TG Forumz. I am not interested in milking more performance out of a component. I am interested in milking more performance out of the dollars I'm spending. Got it?
To all those who said "buy this low end chip and overclock it." That's not what I'm planning to do.
The only person so far who has suggested a chip that was worth pursuing, that wasn't on the list, suggested a low power Core 2 Duo mobile chip (i.e. T5700; T7400). These would be excellent candidates if their pricing was a little more reasonable, and someone else who had more money to spend on this project would probably want to look into that. Unfortunately the motherboards for those chips cost about twice as much as normal motherboards. Good suggestion though!
As for the power supply issue. Reading the original post would reveal that I'm using an Antec Minuet 300 case. If you took a second to look at the information on this case, it does NOT use a standard power supply. If it did, I'd upgrade to a 400-450W model instantly and not even worry about power requirements. It's the most attractive case so far that I've seen for slimline microATX, and as such I already own it. The power supply is not upgradeable, which is why we're working in a 300W area.
To those who would be interested in knowing, the 300W MT300 power supply which comes with the Minuet 300 has dual 12V rails running with a maximum 8.0 and 14.5 A respectively. Adding those, you get a theoretical maximum 270W among those two rails.
I'm somewhat concerned about power requirements, because it's rated 300W, but I did read a review on this case a while back where the reviewers took the power supply out of the case and attached it to a full featured computer with a Geforce 6600GT (a power hungry card for the performance it had), and dual 74G Raptors, as well as a dual core 4200+ (this is based on the 90nm design, too, so take that into account). The voltage drop on the +12V rail was minimal. On the other hand, I'm going to be running a wireless card, a TV tuner, a hard drive that may require more power than the Raptor does (the 1TB Seagate drive that's due out soon). So you get my point.
I've done my homework. It's down to E4300 versus 4800+. I'm not willing to risk overclocking on a power supply that's already going to be close to its maximum rating. So buying a 3600+ and overclocking it is not an option. Buying an E4300 and overclocking it to 2.4 is not an option. Options are what's listed in the poll, running AT THOSE specifications listed. There's a reason I put the GHz in each one - to stress that those are the speeds they will run at in my computer. Either one I get, I'm going for 2GB of DDR2-800 because that's the recommended memory speed for AMD's AM2 platform, and that memory would also run in sync with the FSB on the Allendale chip.
You're more than welcome to back up your vote by posting comments about why the AMD is better at this, or why the Intel is better at that. Feel free to even include links to your favorite benchmarks. Just make sure they pertain to what I'm using the computer for. Feel free to also recommend a motherboard - although I've pretty much decided on an AMD board.
So, when you answer the question in the poll, read it this way:
Which of these chips will perform better at completely stock settings?