I've just bought a machine that is going to host virtual machines (linux/Xen)
I specifically ordered an X2 4800+, 2.4GHz with 1Mb cache per core, but I've been shipped a newer model which is 100MHz faster but has only 512k per core.
It seems to me that for a machine solely running virtual machines a meg of L2 cache is going to make far more difference than 100Mhz. (eg. cache misses are going to be more frequent and costly)
Does anyone know anything or have some links to back this up or should I not bother complaining?
I've just bought a machine that is going to host virtual machines (linux/Xen)
I specifically ordered an X2 4800+, 2.4GHz with 1Mb cache per core, but I've been shipped a newer model which is 100MHz faster but has only 512k per core.
It seems to me that for a machine solely running virtual machines a meg of L2 cache is going to make far more difference than 100Mhz. (eg. cache misses are going to be more frequent and costly)
Does anyone know anything or have some links to back this up or should I not bother complaining?
Cheers
McE
Well it depends on a lot more than the amount of l2 cache for performance...but statistically speaking, 1 mb l2 cache more should have a better performance than 512 l2 cache and 100 more mhz. You can always overclock the processor if needed, which I wouldn't think is.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.