Ad
News

Overvolted RAM May Kill Your Core i7 CPU

Published on October 08, 2008

Memory controllers built into the upcoming Core i7 processors could change the way some enthusiasts push their systems beyond spec Read more

Intel fills gaps with low-power processors

Published on July 21, 2004

Intel introduced four low-power processors for notebooks as new members of the Celeron M and Pentium M series. Read more

Intel launches low-voltage Xeon processor with 800 MHz FSB

Published on October 26, 2004

Intel announced the arrival of a new low-voltage version of its Xeon product series. The new chip is clocked at 2.8 GHz and integrates the 64-bit extension set EM64T. Read more

G.Skill Launches DDR3 Memory Kits for Intel Core i7 Platform

Published on October 29, 2008

G.Skill launched its new triple-channel DDR3 memory kits for the Intel Core i7 platform Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Roundup: The Best Overclocking Software

Published on November 06, 2008

Interested in overclocking but not quite sure where to start? We round up some of our favorite software utilities for tweaking processors, memory, graphics, and chipsets. Read more

Tom's Holiday Buyer's Guide 2008, Part 1

Published on November 05, 2008

Welcome to the first installment in our six-part Tom's Holiday Buyer's Guide. In Part 1, two beautiful models help showcase some of our favorite no-hassle hardware gifts for 2008. Read more

Round Up: Five Powerful, Light Ultraportables

Published on November 05, 2008

Executives, road warriors, and gadget geeks all lust after ultraportable notebooks. Five of these amazing machines battle it out in this roundup. Read more

Core i7: 4-Way CrossFire, 3-way SLI, Paradise?

Published on November 04, 2008

For the first time ever, gamers are being treated to a reasonably priced platform enabling the best that AMD and Nvidia have to offer. Is Core i7 a gamer’s nirvana or does the processor serve up more of the same? Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Which core and voltage to use?
 

Which core and voltage to use?




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Which core and voltage to use?
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Okay, just want opinions as to which of the temps and vcores I should follow.

e6300 @ 433 * 7 = 3032
mem @ 2.1
All other volts on Auto
Ambient = 23.7C

Question I have is, do I use the temps from which of these?

Asus Probe = 70
TaT = 62
CoreTemp = 66

Do I use the Voltage from which of these?

Asus Probe = 1.44
CPU-Z = 1.44
Bios = 1.525

At Idle 5 mins

Asus Probe = 49
TaT = 42/38
CoreTemp = 38/35

Do I use the Voltage from

Asus Probe = 1.5
CPU-Z = 1.213 (clearly wrong)
Bios = 1.525

To me it seems strage that with a Tt Big Typhoon, that I would get a full 30C increase from idle to load as shown in Asus Probe.

Also, heatsink and cpu have been lapped, nice and flat, and all on correctly with AS5

Opinions would be great.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Simply don't trust them. I'm using P5B-E, SpeedFan 4.32, offset -15C at Winbond Temp2. Asus Probe is way off, -15C at least.

EDIT1: Vcore is off in CPU-Z, if you set more than 1.45V in BIOS.

Profile: stranger
More Information

I'm really iffy about Asus Probe, if I take 15C off the temp, then I get a temp of 23 atm, this would be too cold for idle, as the ambient temp in the case is nearly 29.

It's strange, that at idle most of my temps are similar, it's when they get to load that all of the variation starts.

I just tried speed fan, CPU temp is reading the same as Asus Probe, 67C and Core 0 and Core 1 are showing 63.

I guess it's possible that it's really 63 + 15 so, 78, but this seems unlikely to me with a lapped heatsink, cpu etc. At the same time TaT is showing me 60 in each core.

I would like to think my temps were Tcase of 52 @ load with 1.525v but surely that would be unlikely wouldn't it?

Oh, I also have a temp probe in the fins of the cooler, currently showing 29.5.

Oh, i had also changed my speedfan core temps and gave them +15 as I thought this would represnt the TJunction better.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Quote :

I would like to think my temps were Tcase of 52 @ load with 1.525v but surely that would be unlikely wouldn't it?


I've 1.4250V in BIOS, CPU-Z reads it 1.32 under Orthos P9 Small FFTs.

Quote :

Oh, I also have a temp probe in the fins of the cooler, currently showing 29.5.


Believe it.


Quote :

Oh, i had also changed my speedfan core temps and gave them +15 as I thought this would represnt the TJunction better.


Bad.
http://www.alcpu.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=35
In case you're too busy to read it all:

Quote :

According to one of the more interesting threads I've read in Intel's open Dev forums, a very unpleasant picture arrises. Desktop/Server CPUs DON'T have a constant Tjunction temperature, unlike many Mobile CPUs which contains the Tjunction information in bit 30 of MSR 0xEE. This value is either 85/100. Possibly by a mistake, this value seems to exist in the desktop processors as well, but this does not make it valid at all.


Quote :

TAT was developed for mobile CPU usage. The whole Tjunction minus DTSDelta was good for these CPUs(with small deviations of several degrees above or below), but it is basically useless for desktop CPUs. In desktop CPUs the calculation is PROCHOT# minus DTSDelta, and obviously we cannot read PROCHOT# temp.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks for the quotes.

If I don't change the core temps in Speedfan, then it shows them as 15C lower than the CPU temp, which clearly cant be correct. Therefore speedfan just doesn't work with my CPU, MB combination.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Quote :

If I don't change the core temps in Speedfan, then it shows them as 15C lower than the CPU temp, which clearly cant be correct.


CPU temp is read from some sensor (if any) Asus put on the mobo. It's NOT Tcase anyway. I've found SpeedFan 4.32 most believable.


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Which core and voltage to use?

Go to:
 

Google Ads