The latest round of seasonal CPU charts updates from Tom's Hardware Guide reveals what we expected, now that we've had a chance to test Intel's Core 2 Duo E6400 dual-core CPU: At $247 average selling price, according to today's figures from PriceGrabber, it could be the most powerful CPU you can buy today for the fewest dollars. Read more
Intel has silently improved its Core 2 Duo line-up. Read more
The launch of the Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800, Core 2 Duo E6300, E6400, E6600 and E6700 processors, which were originally expected to arrive on 23 July will be postponed to July 27, according to a recent review of Intel's product roadmap by sources at Taiwan motherboard makers. Read more
Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more
We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more
This month's System Builder Marathon spreads the system prices out even further to $4,500, $1,500, and $500. Is today’s $4,500 system really worth three times as much as an upper-mainstream performance machine? Read more
We'd all love to upgrade every time a new piece of gaming hardware drops, but that's an expensive proposition. You think your Athlon 64 system is fairly quick--any chance a simple graphics upgrade can bring it up speed? We're aiming to find out. Read more
We've been publishing our networked storage stories using Intel's NAS Performance tool kit as our primary benchmark. But before we went any further, we thought we'd introduce the software package and its individual components. Read more
| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : Can't go further then 2.45Ghz with E6400
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
Hi, i'm new here so Grtz to everyone.
|
|
Related Product
|
|
Profile: member
More Information
|
what mobo?
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
It's an Asus P5N32 SLI SE DELUXE with nForce4 chipset (could this be the reason?) The northbridge is passively cooled
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
I've read the C2D oc tutorial.
|
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
I have an Abit that its northbridge is passively cooled and pushed all my voltages above that, can't be shure bout the speeds though, but I had no problem with the northbridge overheating. |
|
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
Set PCIe to 100, PCI to 33.33. |
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
PCIe is at 100, and PCI is not available. |
|
Profile: journeyman
More Information
|
Try to set ram speed in BIOS to [BY SPD] with 1:1 ratio. Leave all voltages at stock and try upping the FSB by 10 from 266. If this doesn't work try using the overclocking settings provided in bios. There is one option (if memory serves me right AI NOS) that lets You overclock dynamically in windows. |
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
oops, nevermind, I thought you said 3.5 but yoy said 2.5, hmmmm |
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
I'm trying to flash the bios to a newer version.
|
|
Profile: journeyman
More Information
|
the 1:1 ratio is the FSB to mem.
|
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
nForce 4 chipsets are not good at overclocking, you may be potentially hitting an fsb wall with that motherboard. |
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
|
|
Profile: journeyman
More Information
|
Yes the SPD setting is in regard to memory timings - do not set them Yourself choose [by SPD] or [AUTO]. That may free up some room for a higher OC.
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
I kept the memory setting at auto which is 5-5-5-15
|
|
Profile: journeyman
|
