Great! Thanks a lot guys for the amount of replies
Quote:
With the 2 ethernet card on 1 PC approach, the computer with 2 ethernet card must always be on for the 2nd computer to get internet. The reason for this is that the ethernet cards need power.
I must be really dumb, because I never thought of that.
Although the first computer will likely be on almost 24/7, it'd suck to turn it off and disable the other PC from getting online.
Quote:
I think you'll be disappointed with the ICS route. ICS has a habit of sucking CPU cycles on the hosting machine, and the client machine will suffer greatly from bandwidth anemia. Also, to use ICS on PC B, PC A must be powered on. Do you really want to burn power on two machines to surf the internet?
Mmm damn... so what are other ways to share files? (More on that later in this post).
Quote:
A router won't divide the bandwidth equally. If PC A is using 80 percent of the bandwidth and PC B decides to download something, PC B will get the remaining bandwidth. The converse is also true. If PC B is using 80%, then PC A gets the remaining 20 when it starts a new network task.
Hahaha, this is great and what Im looking for
Quote:
but what about me trying to access lets say, a mail server or apache etc... or is this only possible with the router?
I'm not sure what you mean (is the mail server on your other PC or just a the net) but you shouldn't have any problem. (from what I remember, I've played a lot of UT on the secondary PC) but please read the overview in the windows help before you decide (
hosting on the secondary could be a problem)
I mean like, with the router I can assign an IP to both computers right?
So I wanted to lets say, run Apache on PC #1 (or #2)... and I dont know if that works?
Im not THAT n00b... so I have messed around with LANs at uni etc... just that Im not 100% positive Ill be able to put the computers on a "chat" on any port I desire.
For example, Id like to run mail servers, HTTP servers and such (for testing purposes), also maybe games in LAN (so games access a given port for instance), and other bunch of stuff, like VNC, maybe even a small 2-PC rendering farm
But for this purpose I need to know if, as I said before, the router simply allows communication between PC #1 and #2, in ANY port I wish
And if
eRazor says ICS aint that good... then I could have other alternatives for file sharing, like creating my own kinda php-based file sharing script (hence the need for apache), or simply apache alone and virtual hosts, or maybe some LAN-sharing desktop application...?
Quote:
Most (if not all) router have a build-in firewall which takes the load from the PC (and usually better then a software one)
This is great
I guess I could use it to simply block ports from the outside, and maybe just enable the required ones for Messaging software and the like.
Quote:
depending on how the network is setup between the Rj45 and the thing on the roof you may be able to make do with a Hub/switch which will only cost $10 but as i say it depends on a few things
Mmm interesting... what things?
And how does this changes things? (Like all I asked above), because IIRC there is a difference between hubs, switches and routers (they all belong in a different OSI layer or something, and the way the transfer the data is different?)
There is one last thing... if the whole thing with ports and firewall locking works OK with the router... does this has something that could potentially mean a problem with the "device" on the roof of my building? (As I said before I think it could be a dead-box, or maybe just another router).
Or simply I got the MY router and I can configure things the way I want 100% without worrying about that device on the roof... (maybe just a bit of tweaking here and there in the WAN port where the internet RJ-45 would get plugged in)?
I really appreciate your time, thanks very much