Hello! I am taking a high school algebra course at my local university and am having trouble with a certain type of quadratic equation. I figured someone in these forums might be able to help. It's probably something simple that I'm not understanding.
I actually don't have trouble solving the equation, it's more a question of how the equation works.
Starting with the equation [x+(1/x)=(13/6)], I perform the following steps to put it into the standard quadratic form:
x+(1/x)=(13/6)
(1/x)=-x+(13/6)
1=-x^2+(13x/6)
0=-x^2+(13x/6)-1
The trouble I'm having is that [x+(1/x)=(13/6)] and [0=-x^2+(13x/6)-1] produce different graphs with different x-intercepts.
If the equations are equivalent, why do they produce different x-intercepts?
If the equations are not equivalent, how can manipulating them in this way be mathematically justifiable?
Thanks
I actually don't have trouble solving the equation, it's more a question of how the equation works.
Starting with the equation [x+(1/x)=(13/6)], I perform the following steps to put it into the standard quadratic form:
x+(1/x)=(13/6)
(1/x)=-x+(13/6)
1=-x^2+(13x/6)
0=-x^2+(13x/6)-1
The trouble I'm having is that [x+(1/x)=(13/6)] and [0=-x^2+(13x/6)-1] produce different graphs with different x-intercepts.
If the equations are equivalent, why do they produce different x-intercepts?
If the equations are not equivalent, how can manipulating them in this way be mathematically justifiable?
Thanks