The current machine is an old Compaq EXS 1.8 GHz with a RamBus 512 M RAM, and a hefty external raid system.
It was upto now just a file server, and IIS Server (static PHP) with some database aspects (MySQL).
I've noticed it bouncing off the CPU monitor quite a bit and we are looking at moving to SQL Server with some dot-net products (DotNetNuke, and a new commerce product also dot-net).
Most days we get 100+ hits and usually 10 page views. Expected goal of 200-300 hits a day with 15-20 page views.
Now we are looking at a Xeon system, and the first question is what level should we go with, as from what I understand the moterboard config has different levels (like 4 ram chips or 8 chips capacity). And thhe other is should I be looking at a high end Dual, or a low end quad (they are the same price).
Second question - The target OS is Windows 2000 Adv Server, so would it make sense to have 2, 4, or 8 gigs of Ram, with it.
And suggestions would be great as the price range varies greatly on these.
Why would I waste all my time asking about technical information with detailed information if I was plugging a web site. I always add the url on my tag line, and that was the only reference to it. I'd belabour the point but I am here for technical information not to discuss the merits of website promoting.
What kind of budget do you have? That level of traffic wouldn't require too hefty of a rig. I dare say any new dual-core desktop could easily handle that.
I'm trying to keep the budget down if I can, say 2,500 cdn. but if necessary I'll move up. I'd rather do this and know it will work then go half-assed and have to spend more to patch my mistakes.
I'm trying to keep the budget down if I can, say 2,500 cdn. but if necessary I'll move up. I'd rather do this and know it will work then go half-assed and have to spend more to patch my mistakes.
Quentin
Well honeslty your current server cannot really be upgraded. Or at least no upgrade that would be worth the cost and effort.
RDRAM isn't really used anymore.
You'd need a new Motherboard, new RAM and a new CPU (probably a new Case and Power supply as well). Considering the cost I'd probably suggest a Dual Core AMD Processor (Athlon64 X2). Something around a 3800+. It really depends on what RAID array you're using too. You might need a board with a 64bit PCI slot if your using SCSI RAID with a 64bit controller.
I'd also suggest about 1GB of PC2 5700 DDR Memory (2x512MB) and a solid Gigabyte or Asus AM2 socket motherboard.
Because your usage isn't extremely stressful you probably don't need to go Opteron or Xeon.
For those Curious..
Compaq EXS
What's New
NEW IntelÒ PentiumÒ 4 processor with 400MHz Front Side Bus
NEW IntelÒ 850 chipset Non-ECC RDRAM Enhanced Graphics
Easy Access Keyboard
Scroll Mouse
Suspend to RAM support
At A Glance
IntelÒ Pentium 4 (400MHz FSB) 1.3, 1.4 or 1.5 GHz processor and IntelÒ 850 chipset 256-KB integrated full speed L2 cache High capacity Ultra ATA Quiet Seek and Idle hard drives with Drive Protection System Five bays (three external, two internal) Six slots (one AGP, five PCI) NVIDIA GeForce2 GTS 32-MB or NVIDIA TNT2 Pro AGP graphics controller Intel PRO/100+ Management Adapter with Wake-on-LAN and Alert-on-LAN support Integrated SoundBlaster PCI 128 Audio Service-friendly design Protected by Compaq Services, including a 3-1-1 limited warranty. Certain restrictions and exclusions apply.
I should clarify that by upgrading the server, I'm replacing the entire box. Also since the bus structure has changed, I was looking at going with 2-300 GB drives mirrored, and use the raid system for the file system, backups, etc. The quest really started in earnest 2 weeks ago when I realized the memory ugrade expense and limitations of that unit.
The existing Raid is only 1TB using an external Promise Enclosure. but I know the scsi card is older, so either the scsi card needs to be upgraded as well, or I just use the raid as a secondary unit or I keep the entire unit as is as a secondary baby server.
ok dude, i'm not much of an expert on servers but i did alittle research and i found out that its all about the speed of the FSB so you'll have fast communication between the cup, ram and hard drives. heres what i cooked up.
what i recommend is that with the processor i chose, you overclock it to 3.2 Ghz and you'll get a 1600Mhz Front Sid Bus. add to that the four cores and four gigs or ram and you've got a power house. i chose the Armor because of the large amount of room for hard drives and the extra 250mm side fan will keep everything nice and cool. the Swiftech cooler is to make sure to keep your north bridge cool under a 600Mhz overclock
So is there any benefit to moving to a server style hardware? How would your recommendation compare to this system? (note I'd upgrade the hd's in it to 300's)
ok dude, i'm not much of an expert on servers but i did alittle research and i found out that its all about the speed of the FSB so you'll have fast communication between the cup, ram and hard drives. heres what i cooked up.
what i recommend is that with the processor i chose, you overclock it to 3.2 Ghz and you'll get a 1600Mhz Front Sid Bus. add to that the four cores and four gigs or ram and you've got a power house. i chose the Armor because of the large amount of room for hard drives and the extra 250mm side fan will keep everything nice and cool. the Swiftech cooler is to make sure to keep your north bridge cool under a 600Mhz overclock
So is there any benefit to moving to a server style hardware? How would your recommendation compare to this system? (note I'd upgrade the hd's in it to 300's)
And out of curiousity, how big of a difference is there performance wize between your suggested system and my current antiquated one?
Quentin
Very comparable...
Xeons are mean't, mainly to be used in multiple processor environment. It used to be they had larger Caches and more performance per clock then their desktop counterparts but that's really no longer the case. That's Xeon is actually a lot like a Core 2 Duo E6300.
Here's something that will trump that Server in performance yet cost less.
Antec SLK1650 Mid-Tower Case w/350W PS - $64.95
Asus P5WDG2-WS Pro S775 i975X ATX Mainboard SATAII/Raid/CrossFire/GbE/PCI-X - $375.00
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 1.86GHz 2MB/1066FSB Processor - $209.95
Kingston ValueRam 2GB DC PC2-5300 DDR2 Memory Kit - $133.00
Asus Radeon AX300SE-X 128MB PCIe DH Video Card w/TV-OUT, Retail - $49.00
2xSeagate 7200.10 320GB 7200RPM 16MB SATAII Hard Drive, 5Yr - 198.00
LG GSA-H50N 18X DVD+/-RW Drive BEIGE, OEM - $41.00
And out of curiousity, how big of a difference is there performance wize between your suggested system and my current antiquated one?
And I guess I don't need to be looking at the upper end of the Xeon duals then. That will save me a lot of coin, especially if a desktop will suffice!
You're looking at a non-comparable performance difference. Something like comparing the performance of a rocket powered card with that of a Pontiac Firefly.
I'm not exagerating either.
But it this way.. An Intel Pentium 4 1.8GHz is much faster then your Celeron, an Intel Pentium 4 with Two cores and clocked over 4GHz (two 4GHz cores) still doesn't match the power of the Core 2 Duo Processor I suggested.
ok the ST1000I Series Server System is no where near the power of the one i built for you, how? heres how; dual core V.S. the Quad core, integrated VGA card V.S. 8600GTS!, 550watt "server"PSU V.S. enermax 1000Watt PSU, PC4200 2G DDR2 ECC Memory V.S. 4Gb of PC6400 memory. i didnt chose any hard drives cause i though u had some. heres my revised comp,
EVGA E-GEFORCE 8500 GT 450MHZ 256MB 128BIT DDR2 PCI-E Dual DVI-I HDTV Out DIRECTX10 Video Card
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB SATA2 3GB/S 7200RPM 16MB Cache NCQ Hard Drive x2 in RAID 1 or 0, which ever u want
Sony AW-Q170A DVD+RW 18X8X16 DVD-RW 18X6X16 DL 8X/4X IDE 2MB Black OEM W/O Software
this totals up to $2,403.50, still under budget.
if you wanted to save money, you could go for a dual core E6600( save 250 bucks) you'll get much higher performance then the ST1000I but no where near the power of the Q6600. i drooped the GFX card for a lower one because of the server application. the 1000 watt PSU i recommend stays for the ability to add more hard drives in the future with out a problem. if you don;t like the build i'm giving you, dont be shy to speak up.
P.S. if your stuck on Xenon and Core2Duo, there isnt a difference. both perform identically; only difference is that Xenons are batched higher meaning they and handle higher voltages. you wont have to worry about that.
ok the ST1000I Series Server System is no where near the power of the one i built for you, how? heres how; dual core V.S. the Quad core, integrated VGA card V.S. 8600GTS!, 550watt "server"PSU V.S. enermax 1000Watt PSU, PC4200 2G DDR2 ECC Memory V.S. 4Gb of PC6400 memory. i didnt chose any hard drives cause i though u had some. heres my revised comp,
EVGA E-GEFORCE 8500 GT 450MHZ 256MB 128BIT DDR2 PCI-E Dual DVI-I HDTV Out DIRECTX10 Video Card
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB SATA2 3GB/S 7200RPM 16MB Cache NCQ Hard Drive x2 in RAID 1 or 0, which ever u want
Sony AW-Q170A DVD+RW 18X8X16 DVD-RW 18X6X16 DL 8X/4X IDE 2MB Black OEM W/O Software
this totals up to $2,403.50, still under budget.
if you wanted to save money, you could go for a dual core E6600( save 250 bucks) you'll get much higher performance then the ST1000I but no where near the power of the Q6600. i drooped the GFX card for a lower one because of the server application. the 1000 watt PSU i recommend stays for the ability to add more hard drives in the future with out a problem. if you don;t like the build i'm giving you, dont be shy to speak up.
P.S. if your stuck on Xenon and Core2Duo, there isnt a difference. both perform identically; only difference is that Xenons are batched higher meaning they and handle higher voltages. you wont have to worry about that.