AMD K10 lineup details (Dailytech)

1Tanker

Splendid
Apr 28, 2006
4,645
1
22,780
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7157

Now would they just hurry up and release these damn CPUs?
I notice that Phenom FX TDP is undecided yet, which leads me to believe they're having troubles getting the expected speeds. :?
 

Dade_0182

Distinguished
Apr 3, 2006
1,102
0
19,280
Seems interesting. Hopefully this'll actually release when they say it will be. R600 just totally put me off their release dates...
 

Harrisson

Distinguished
Jan 3, 2007
506
0
18,990
Q3 mentioned for orders, most likely we will be able to buy them in retail channel in Q4.

TDP for AgenaFX will be 95-125W. Most sites I checked mentioned 95W, but I guess AMD will be pushing for higher clocks and TDP will be up to 125.
 

m25

Distinguished
May 23, 2006
2,363
0
19,780
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7157

Now would they just hurry up and release these damn CPUs?
I notice that Phenom FX TDP is undecided yet, which leads me to believe they're having troubles getting the expected speeds. :?
To stick to the promised TDPs they also have to show something like 45W K8 X2s but their 65nm SOI has not gone any further up to now.
 

m25

Distinguished
May 23, 2006
2,363
0
19,780
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7157

Now would they just hurry up and release these damn CPUs?
The interesting thing is that the AM2+ X4s are to be released at the same time as the Socket F ones; if performance is about what they claim it to be... I'd like to see the price tag of the 2.2GHz model... should not be hard to get 2.8 GHz out of it with water cooling.
 

Ycon

Distinguished
Feb 1, 2006
1,359
0
19,280
Does the word "suckage" exist?
Probably not, but its just what these processors are... who had the idea to release 29385 different bus speeds?
Also low-power with 45W doesnt really look like low-power.
 

Dahak

Distinguished
Mar 26, 2006
1,267
0
19,290
Lookin none too shabby there eh.I hope the performance is as good as it seems.

Dahak

AMD X2-4400+@2.6 TOLEDO
EVGA NF4 SLI MB
2X EVGA 7950GT KO IN SLI
4X 512MB CRUCIAL BALLISTIX DDR500
WD300GIG HD/SAMSUNG 250GIG HD
ACER 22IN WIDESCREEN LCD 1600X1200
THERMALTAKE TOUGHPOWER 850WATT PSU
COOLERMASTER MINI R120
3DMARK05 13,471
 

m25

Distinguished
May 23, 2006
2,363
0
19,780
I'd like to see the price tag of the 2.2GHz model... should not be hard to get 2.8 GHz out of it with water cooling.
I'd like to have seen that with say top end air cooling but that's hoping for alot...
Probably you will be able to get 2.7-2.8 GHz with a Tuniq but I don't like that kind of coolers; too cumbersome and noisy for getting the job done properly. If I have to get a cooler that fills half of the case, it's better be liquid cooling; more efficient and quiet and even if you have to deal with water, it's still way safer than having a 1KG+ weight all hanging out of your motherboard.
 

corvetteguy

Distinguished
Jan 15, 2006
1,545
0
19,780
Does the word "suckage" exist?
Probably not, but its just what these processors are... who had the idea to release 29385 different bus speeds?
Also low-power with 45W doesnt really look like low-power.

How is 45w not low power? tool
 

m25

Distinguished
May 23, 2006
2,363
0
19,780
Does the word "suckage" exist?
Probably not, but its just what these processors are... who had the idea to release 29385 different bus speeds?
Also low-power with 45W doesnt really look like low-power.

How is 45w not low power? tool
Oh yes, and having 3-4 differend HTT speeds is gay... :roll: As MU_Engineer noted, that is 1.5x the core speed and if the HTT/core ratio is fixed, that only makes performance scale more linearly with frequency.
 

corvetteguy

Distinguished
Jan 15, 2006
1,545
0
19,780
Does the word "suckage" exist?
Probably not, but its just what these processors are... who had the idea to release 29385 different bus speeds?
Also low-power with 45W doesnt really look like low-power.

How is 45w not low power? tool
Oh yes, and having 3-4 differend HTT speeds is gay... :roll:

I looked up "suckage" to see if it was a word. Turns out, there was no definition. only a picture of ycon.
 

ajfink

Distinguished
Dec 3, 2006
1,150
0
19,280
FX are returning to the desktop socket.

I wouldn't think one would need massive cooling to get to 2.8Ghz or higher, much as one doesn't need super-mad-impressive cooling now to get 2.8 or even 3Ghz out of a Brisbane. Different architecture, yes, but a more refined process and similar clocks. I could be wrong.

edit - I wonder how multipliers are going to factor in with all these different bus speeds. The 2.8Ghz dual-core has the highest speed so far.
 

m25

Distinguished
May 23, 2006
2,363
0
19,780
FX are returning to the desktop socket.

I wouldn't think one would need massive cooling to get to 2.8Ghz or higher, much as one doesn't need super-mad-impressive cooling now to get 2.8 or even 3Ghz out of a Brisbane. Different architecture, yes, but a more refined process and similar clocks. I could be wrong.

edit - I wonder how multipliers are going to factor in with all these different bus speeds. The 2.8Ghz dual-core has the highest speed so far.
A 3.0GHz X4 may go past 150W, so liquid cooling might be a better solution.
 

ajfink

Distinguished
Dec 3, 2006
1,150
0
19,280
FX are returning to the desktop socket.

I wouldn't think one would need massive cooling to get to 2.8Ghz or higher, much as one doesn't need super-mad-impressive cooling now to get 2.8 or even 3Ghz out of a Brisbane. Different architecture, yes, but a more refined process and similar clocks. I could be wrong.

edit - I wonder how multipliers are going to factor in with all these different bus speeds. The 2.8Ghz dual-core has the highest speed so far.
A 3.0GHz X4 may go past 150W, so liquid cooling might be a better solution.

Oh, no doubt for a quad core. It would be comparable (or slightly worse) compared to a QX6800 in terms of power consumption, and those things bake.
 

lambofgode3x

Distinguished
Oct 10, 2006
449
0
18,790
FX are returning to the desktop socket.

I wouldn't think one would need massive cooling to get to 2.8Ghz or higher, much as one doesn't need super-mad-impressive cooling now to get 2.8 or even 3Ghz out of a Brisbane. Different architecture, yes, but a more refined process and similar clocks. I could be wrong.

edit - I wonder how multipliers are going to factor in with all these different bus speeds. The 2.8Ghz dual-core has the highest speed so far.
A 3.0GHz X4 may go past 150W, so liquid cooling might be a better solution.

so get either a CoolIt Eliminator or a CoolIt Freezone....both great coolers...and they look cool.
 

lambofgode3x

Distinguished
Oct 10, 2006
449
0
18,790
honestly, i expect these processors to be real expencive when they come out, but come down in price so they are competitive to c2d processors...
 

m25

Distinguished
May 23, 2006
2,363
0
19,780
honestly, i expect these processors to be real expencive when they come out, but come down in price so they are competitive to c2d processors...
It all depends on how Intel will price their quads at that time; I hope to get a 2.2G Phenom X4 for around $400 and OC 2.8-3.0 out of it right from the start. That's what I'd call investment :wink:
 

ethel

Distinguished
May 20, 2006
1,130
0
19,290
honestly, i expect these processors to be real expencive when they come out, but come down in price so they are competitive to c2d processors...

Yeah, well they've got to start making some money!