Ad
News

Windows Campaign Violating Trademark?

Published on September 30, 2008

Microsoft is being targeted by a startup company going by the name ‘G.ho.st’ in an apparent claim that Microsoft is violating a company trademark. Read more

With Intel resuming 865-series chipset production, DRAM makers asked to produce more DDR

Published on November 15, 2005

With Intel reportedly scheduled to restart production of entry-level 865GV chipsets this quarter, the chip giant requested DRAM makers to allot more capacity for DDR, according to sources at memory makers. Read more

AMD To Offer More Processors For Embedded Systems

Published on January 23, 2008

AMD announced a number of platform-stable, energy-efficient additions to its embedded roadmap at the AMD Taiwan Embedded Forum this week. Read more

X Prize, Google Set On 10 Teams In $30 Million Race To Moon

Published on February 22, 2008

The X Prize Foundation and Google announced the first ten teams to register for the Google Lunar X Prize, the groups' robot race to the moon worth $30 million in prizes. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Intel's Core i7: Blazing Fast, But Crippled O/C

Published on November 03, 2008

Core i7--previously referred to as Nehalem--requires new motherboards, coolers and memory. Its performance is compelling and means AMD is falling behind even further, but Intel is putting in some speed bumps that will impact overclocking enthusiasts. Read more

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on October 31, 2008

Three dramatically different builds face off in a show of performance, defining the real value of each. Our mainstream system is designed to meet the needs of most users. Who should spend more and who can live with less? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $500 Gaming PC

Published on October 30, 2008

For the second to last day of our System Builder Marathon series, we add a $500 gaming PC to the mix. It's not going to be as quick as our other two builds, but we think Paul was able to get some serious value from this thing. Read more

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » CPU Question - Opinions Requested
 

CPU Question - Opinions Requested




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : CPU Question - Opinions Requested
 
Profile: Forum Gigolo
More Information

I'm ordering parts for a new system. CPU:
E6600 Conroe - $226
- for $10 more ...
Xeon 3060 Conroe - $236
Or will it make much difference (or cause problems)?

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

They're basically the same chip. Perhaps the Xeon is binned a tad higher, but it smells of the PIII Xeons if you ask me- normal-line chip with the "Xeon" name sold for a markup. I'd go for the E6600, unless there are good reports of the Xeon 3060s overclocking much better than the E6600 if you're into that.

C’est magnifique, mais ce n’est pas la guerre.
Profile: Forum Master
More Information

Not exactly much better, maybe a few °C and a 100MHz over the Core 2's maximum. It really only matters if you plan to overclock to extremes.

And here's the evidence...

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

i say go for the cheaper one. $10 isn't worth that minimal of a performance increase.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

if you OC go for the Xeon

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Quote :

Not exactly much better, maybe a few °C and a 100MHz over the Core 2's maximum. It really only matters if you plan to overclock to extremes.

And here's the evidence...


I was just about to put that link in here too. Well, it´s still a nice thread. :)

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Well,

Ive had my 6600 since july of last year, and other than TAT, and a few programs designed specifically to load up the cores, I have yet to do anything that has been able to task the CPU. The things I have done have been amazing. It will rip a CD faster than I could transfer the mp3s from and external drive, it doesnt even notice Norton2005 full system virus scan (it has actually run in the backround during a game without me even noticing it) It flies through renders on 3DSmax and while I have yet to run any of my video editing software, I suspect it process exceptionally fast.

Other than the fact it says zeon, the chip specs out the same in cache, FSB, socket and clock speed. Looks like a higher binned 6600 as MUEngineer said. If you want to OC to the max, spend the extra 10, if not the 6600 will overclock to 3.0GHz on air just fine. I havent even thought about overclocking.


<Edit> If you dont want to overclock, and are thinking about building an entire system, you may want to consider the X26000 @ $229. Its equal to or 1-2% faster overall than the E6600, depending on which review/test/blog you read/beleive.

Profile: Forum Gigolo
More Information

Quote :

<Edit> If you dont want to overclock, and are thinking about building an entire system, you may want to consider the X26000 @ $229. Its equal to or 1-2% faster overall than the E6600, depending on which review/test/blog you read/beleive.


Be kind of hard now since the GB DS3 board is arriving today :?

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Being efficient by a few degrees and maybe overall better Binned Chip it's better to spring over 10$ for that, It's almost like paying for Thermal paste, But your getting the thermal efficiency built in.

Plus, Everybody has a Core 2 Duo, why not just pay 10$ for the Xeon Premium bin and Brand Name :D

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

You'll pay $10 only because the box of the CPU has the "Xeon" label. Not worth IMO, because the chips are identical. The Ninja's review is not a solid proof that the Xeon runs cooler. Different CPUs will dissipate different heat. It depends on luck, the evenness of the surface of the CPU, how the thermal grease is applied, etc.

@turpit
The X2 6000+ is not worth the money, compared to both the E6600 or the 3060. It costs and performs roughly same, but dissipates heat and consumes power twice.

Profile: stranger
More Information

we need more benchmark data to decide

Profile: member
More Information

Who cares? Its only 10 bucks. Get the Xeon. :)

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Stock benchmarks are going to be the same as both have the same FSB, are used in the same motherboards, same amount of cache, same clock speed, and same microarchitecture. The thing that might be illuminating is if somebody got about ten of each kind of chip and used the same board and cooler to do overclocking tests on them. My guess is that it wouldn't be a significant difference either way, but I'm not ready to pony up five grand for the CPUs to test.

Profile: addict
More Information

dont entirely agree with that if that $10 meant you could get a better psu or something save your money but then again if your budget is kinda loose the higher binning is probably worth it

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Quote :

<Edit> If you dont want to overclock, and are thinking about building an entire system, you may want to consider the X26000 @ $229. Its equal to or 1-2% faster overall than the E6600, depending on which review/test/blog you read/beleive.


Be kind of hard now since the GB DS3 board is arriving today :?

The difference between the XEON and C2D isn't so much a matter of performance as it is platform. I doubt you're going to see a real difference between the two in terms of performance.

In short, the C2D lets you overclock, but the XEON lets you double-up the chips (good upgrade path), and gives you access to things like PCI-X and motherboards with integrated SCSI/SAS. PCI-X lets you buy RAID cards for less money because the PCIe cards generally cost two times the amount of their PCI-X counterparts.

I went C2D because I like to overclock. I'm regretting it now because I want to upgrade to 15k drives, and the PCI-e controller is going to run me > US$300 alone.

Profile: member
More Information

Its still only $10. To use your example, I'm sure you could pull another 10 from somewhere to cover that extra bit for the psu as well. If you can't, and your budget really is THAT tight, then you probably shouldn't be considering buying a new computer.

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information