Word :    Username :           
 

Im not 100% sure where this belongs but since I belive its a problem with Vista I put it here. I bought a new computer a few months ago and ive been having nothing but problems with it. It ran fine for the first few days. I started playing a game and about 20 minutes in the game froze. I had no other option but to hit the shutdown button on my tower. I turned it back on and got a black screen. I shut down again and restarted and got as far as the ASUS screen. The third time I did get back into Vista but it took a much longer then usual amount of time. I changed the RAM that came with the computer since the most common response was that my RAM went bad when I asked on here. I also changed my power supply in hopes of getting this computer running again so I can add a better video card.I can boot in to windows Vista after changing those parts. Im not sure which fixed the problem of not being able to start up but it does take alot longer then it used to.The computer also refuses to shut down on its own. I always have to hold the button. Im begining to think that something got damaged when whatever part went bad. I want to go back to XP because I prefer it but I read somewhere on this site that XP doesnt put both cores to use and that it just notices one. I clicked through a few pages to see if anyone else asked this question about vista not shutting down and I couldnt find it. I appologize if its already been answered.Thanks in advanced.


My system specs
Intel duo core 2.13ghz
2gb ddr2 667mhz
ASUS P5L-MX mobo
Evga geforce 7600GT
Windows Vista premium


Message edited by mike1968 on 08-19-2007 at 05:56:58 PM
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

Well - Regarding your comp: I'd put it back to stock condition, call the maker, and b*tch at their support team long and hard until they fix or replace it... You shouldn't have to deal with that on a store/vendor bought system.

If the vendor won't support you, or if they figure out that you changed components and refuse to... There's an awful lot of potential territory to cover for a BB. I doubt it's the PSU: That's pretty much a succeed/fail component. If it's wrong, normally the computer won't even Post. You say you're able to get the OS going, so I'm inclined to look elsewhere for the trouble. But rechecking that your connections are solid can't hurt.

Given that you say it's a new system, and allowing that you've used MSFT Update for your system and have the latest BIOS and drivers installed for your installed components (you do, right?? If not, then do that *FIRST*). Know that there *are* a couple of major~ish updates for Vista on MSFT's site, and one of them is supposed to handle sleep/resume issues.

if that doesn't work, I'd be inclined to back up my user data. Then get out the BFG9000, reformat, and do a clean re-install. If the system is that new, then you shouldn't have all that much stored on it yet, at least. Plus you'll get rid of all of your vendor's pre-installed crapware. But that's me, and I'll tell you right off the bat that I have little patience for detailed troubleshooting.


Regarding "No Multi-Cores in XP" - Someone's full of sh*t. It may not have the potential to use them as fully as Vista supposedly can, but XP does indeed recognize multiple CPU cores. Perhaps someone was pointing out that most (nearly all, really) of the applications written for PC nowadays do not untilize multiple cores. But that's an application issue, not an Operating System one. I can tell you for a fact that the OS will see all the cores on your CPU.

What will happen is a single app (game, whatever) will only run on a single core. Additional apps can and will run on the additional cores. So your game can utilize one core, and background apps can use the other. Given enough RAM, you can game and compile a video at the same time with a minimum of slowdown. Pretty hard to do that effectively on a single core/chip because both apps have to compete for CPU cycles. Again, from personal experience, XP is plenty intelligent enough to do this reasonably well. Also - This is basically the exact same approach as Vista uses: The OS knows the cores are there, but it's up to the application whether or not it utilizes multiple cores or only runs on one of them. Vista is just more aggressive about reserving and assigning system resources than XP is.

I know that's not much help, but....

Scott

Thread has links to the updates: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ity-compat ibility


Message edited by Scotteq on 08-20-2007 at 02:16:46 PM
Reply to Scotteq
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows Vista > Vista General Discussion > Vista not shutting down
Go to:

There are 702 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them