I've been using Norton for a couple of years now, and people have been saying bad reviews for their products, Norton for me has been well, Its never found any viruses, IDK if thats cause I dont have any or because Norton does really suck. I did online virus test from major anti-virus companies and non of em found virsus so I guess Iam virsus free.
But im not sure (I cant really realize it) but I think Norton Makes windows start up 3minutes slower...
I have charts of the best Internet Security and Anti-Virus:
I'm currently using an earlier version of Bitdefender's standalone antivirus program and it works well. Planning on upgrading to the Bitdefendere security suite when my subscription expires. Right after I bought it it found an E Mail virus and I couldn't find the E Mail. Sent an E Mail to Bitdefender support and got a response within 24 hours with the solution, which I thought was very impressive support.
I am a hardcore fan of freeware.
I am using aVast!, which is pretty good.
In addition, there are a lot other freeware with high stability and require little system resource.
I do not need the customer support serivce, so freeware is usually my choice.
In contrast, if you really need premiun protection, Bitdefender is not bad.
I am currently using kaspersky and i am happy with it. To me it is the best. it has a free online virus scanner uaing that even if you are running a different anivirus it can search for viruses and i was using nod32 at that time and online scanner detected few viruses that nod32 didn't detected so i switched to kaspersky.