Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Will my CPU hold back a DX10 card? *Your thoughts requested*
 

Will my CPU hold back a DX10 card? *Your thoughts requested*

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Will my CPU hold back a DX10 card? *Your thoughts requested*
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

OK all, so I am in need of uplifting my video card from an APG 6600GT to something else, preferably a DX10 card. I was thinking the PCI-e 8600GTS.

Here is the RUB.
My rig now has an AMD Athlon 64 4000+ San Diego (939) sitting with 2 GB of DDR ram. So the question is, do I hold off on a replacing my CPU and mem for now and just get a new inexpensive MB that has PCI-e or will my older CPU and DDR ram hamper the 8600GTS?

I believe that the 8600GTS will be hindered a little by my older CPU and RAM but will this be significant?

The MB would only be a stop gap to get me to PCI-e in the short term, so spending 50 to 75 bucks on a 939 MB that has PCI-e would be an acceptable waste of money if it would get me another year on my current CPU and RAM system. After that I would want to buy a MB with a longer life on its socket, LGA...AM2, and of course new CPU, and some new DDR2 RAM.

Please give me your thoughts...

The rest of my RIG is newer,
ANTEC 550W TRUE POWER TRIO
320GB WD SATA II HD
LITE-ON DVD/RW
HAUPPAGE MCE150

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Because Mike Rowe said so!
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

I would personally not put any money into a 939 socket setup. Save your $$$ toward something better. That $50-75 could go for a LGA or AM2 Mobo instead of one you are going to replace anyways. I don't think it would hamper your system very much with a 8600gts... If it does it won't be much. I'd save to replace your mobo, pcu, and memory. This is just my personal opinion though.

Profile: newbie
More Information

Nvidia might launch a 8600Gts of agp or some other manufacturer can do that,you can wait and see .certainly, it is no problem running a 8600gts at your system

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

A CPU probably wouldn't hold back a DX10 video card. Much too short- CPUs are practically flat. Now put the heatsink on the CPU and then maybe you'll hold the GPU back. Holding back the GPU is the job of the PCIe slot connector and the expansion-slot bracket :D

Seriously, just wait until DX10 games come out before getting a card specifically for DX10. Your 4000+ and 2 GB RAM will run Windows 2000/XP or Linux just fine and something like the ATi x1950 Pro AGP will get you another year or two for gaming. When lots of games are DX10, you'll likely need Vista to run them. That's the time to get a multi-core CPU, 4 GB or more or RAM, and a DX10 GPU.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Short answer: No.

The 8600GTS, while a DirectX10 card, isn't a high end video card. Maybe if you were going to get an 8800GTX or GTS, those posibly could be bottlenecked by your CPU.

Profile: old hand
More Information

With an 8600GTS, I can't see the bottleneck.

With an 8800GTX - maybe a little, but it would still be worth getting it big time.

Get an 8800GTS 320MB - it's a much better deal.

Profile: old hand
More Information

In most cases, bottlenecking by the CPU means 100FPS vs 120FPS. Most people don't even have monitors that can display 100FPS, so the extra 20 or so is nothing. Furthermore, the 8600 line isn't very powerful, and the 4000 still is a good CPU, so CPU bottlenecking shouldn't be an issue.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

DX10 is pointless now...i wanna get a x1950xt...they are 180 at the egg and soon they'll be 150ish...thats gonna be THE budget card...it'll stomp all of the 8600's for sure....

for me its either the x1950xt or a 8600gts 320meg those are the two budget cards now...(180 and 280...sometimes 250)

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

Whats going to hold you back is the lack of DX10 games, not your CPU. At this point in time, I wouldn't bother changing your motherboard. Grab a x1950pro agp for $186 after rebate. Use this system until you need to jump to dual core. By then we should have even better stuff, or the good stuff of today will be very cheap.

Profile: addict
More Information

Quote :


I used to have a 4000+ and it was a great overclocker. Had it stable at 2950ghz 8)



3Thz?

Kinda puts the E6600's OC potential to shame...

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

Quote :



DX10 is not pointless now :roll: I love how you people that say this seem to forget that for the past 7months the 8800GTX has been ruling every DX9 game on the market with 16XAA and blazing FPS.


Especially If you play Oblivion, Stalker, Call Of Juarez, R6, Tombraider legends its well worth owning one.



Huh? The 8800GTX has been kicking butt in DX9 games, not DX10. DX10 is pointless for right now. Requires you to use a bad (compared to XP) OS, and there aren't even any DX10 games to play. Crysis, Alan Wake, Flight Sim X, etc haven't been released yet. (in DX10 form) I know of a few demos, but thats not really what I want to play.

I'm not saying to ignore the 8800, I'm saying don't worry about DX10 yet. Wait for Vista performance to improve. Wait for better cheaper DX10 cards to arrive. Wait for the 8800GTS to get closer to the $200 mark. Wait for DX10 games to arrive that are worth playing. Don't waste $210 on a 8600GTS, spend the extra $40 on something worth it.


Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Will my CPU hold back a DX10 card? *Your thoughts requested*
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

Emotiv wants your brainpower

Published on March 07, 2007

The phrase "use your brain" gets a new meaning with Emotiv's development kit, which, according to the company, will allow the creation of games that can interface with a player's thoughts, actions and emotions. Read more

Mu-Card Alliance's new 2 TByte 'µcard' ready

Published on January 04, 2005

The new 2 TByte (2048 GByte) "µcard," developed by Taiwan's Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) and seven local-industry players, is now waiting for marketable solutions to be developed, based on the initial specifications established in early October. Read more

Nvidia Expected To Offer DirectX 10.1 GPU In Q'1, 2009

Published on July 03, 2008

Chicago (IL) - Nvidia so far declined to provide any information if and when the company will consider support the DirectX 10. Read more

ATI Radeon 4850/4870 Mix And Match With Radeon 3850/3870

Published on June 23, 2008

Mountain House (CA) - If everything goes according to plan, we will see AMD's new Radeon GPU launch this week. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Atom, Athlon, or Nano? Energy-Savers Compared

Published on October 03, 2008

We compared Intel’s Atom 230 and VIA’s Nano L2100 processors hoping to find the best product for low-power applications. VIA is in the vanguard of performance. Is this enough to beat Atom? Read more

Interview: Bigfoot's Killer NIC, Exposed

Published on October 02, 2008

Since its release, the Killer NIC has garnered a reputation for being an extravagant and largely unnecessary add-on for the do-it-yourselfer. Seeking additional insight, we approached the card's designer. Read more

Seagate's 1.5TB Barracuda: Bigger And Better?

Published on October 02, 2008

Seagate is the first hard drive vendor to offer a 1.5 TB drive in the 3.5” form factor. Meanwhile, WD sent us its RAID Edition 3 (RE3) drive. We tell you which is the best HDD choice today. Read more

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more