Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Linux/Free BSD > General Discussion > State of ATI and NVIDIA drivers in Linux

State of ATI and NVIDIA drivers in Linux

Forum Linux/Free BSD : General Discussion State of ATI and NVIDIA drivers in Linux

Word :    Username :           
 

Do any of you know what the current state of Linux graphics support is from ATI and NVIDIA? From my own personal experience, I'd say that NVIDIA's Linux drivers subjectively rate somewhere between "OK" and "good", but I am not sure how they compare performance-wise to the windows drivers. I know there have been some comparisons on www.phoronix.com but sometimes its not clear if Linux support is improving or not. As for ATI graphics, I had heard ages ago that ATI was sponsoring some open source drivers, but they seemed to be competing with another open source drivers effort? Also, have their open source drivers reached parity with their windows drivers? Or have they at least reached parity with their fglrx drivers? Also, if anyone here using ATI cards could tell me if installing their fglrx drivers has gotten any easier, I'd appreciate it. I remember spending HOURS with Linux_0 trying to get the damn things to work, but that was years ago so I'd hope that things have improved by now.

Thanks.

--Zorak

Reply to Zorak
Register or log in to remove.

I yield the floor to MU.

:)

------------------------------ $GNU_Linux=$Linus_Torvalds=AWESOME();
Reply to linux_0

audiovoodoo wrote :

They're that difficult to set-up??



Please bear in mind this was back in 2005/06 when i first started out using Linux. For some reason, I had one major bitch of a time trying to get the fglrx drivers working under Fedora (I don't remember which one it was at the time, perhaps version 6?), but I am hoping that the quality and ease of installation have improved since then.

Reply to Zorak

My FGLRX drivers pretty much installed themselves in Ubuntu. Not sure if that's any help to you, but I figured I'd throw it out there :)

Reply to Pyroflea

From a long-term perspective, my ranking is

open-source 3D drivers (including Intel) > NVIDIA proprietary driver > ATI proprietary driver.

Of course, open-source drivers are only best if they provide full 3D support for your card (and this is not always the case, for example "radeonhd" driver may have full/partial/no 3D support depending on the graphics card). Also, recently there have been a lot of issues with the Intel drivers (see http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php? [...] #feature). Lastly, YMMV depending on the kernel, X.org version, and other things used.

Having said that, ATI has gotten better over time but I still have more issues on ATI systems than on systems with Intel or NVIDIA graphics. Personally, I was spared by the recent Intel fiasco.

Reply to jasperjones
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Linux/Free BSD > General Discussion > State of ATI and NVIDIA drivers in Linux
Go to:

There are 2079 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Dual Boot Windows 7 and Ubuntu 12.04
By ijack, 4 days ago:

To get the best performance and lifetime from your SSD you should plan a little more...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts