This is the most insanely stupid and unecessary flaw in Vista and a complete dealbreaker for those handling large video files, like myself. Can anyone explain why MS can not get 1G networking to "just work" like it does on XP?
If I connect to an XP shared folder and drag a file to a local, Vista folder, the copy occurs haltingly at about 8% network utilization.
If I RDP to the XP machine and drag the file to the SAME Vista folder shared to the XP system, the copy goes at 49% (!!!!) utilization. That is the expected, hardware limited speed.
This can't be any driver or hardware problem since NOTHING about the two copies is different except the initiator and sharing direction. If I drag a file to a folder, why can't Vista assume that I am WAITING for that copy to be done and apply all resources to complete it ASAP. Did any of the product managers on Vista every use a computer for real work?
If I connect to an XP shared folder and drag a file to a local, Vista folder, the copy occurs haltingly at about 8% network utilization.
If I RDP to the XP machine and drag the file to the SAME Vista folder shared to the XP system, the copy goes at 49% (!!!!) utilization. That is the expected, hardware limited speed.
This can't be any driver or hardware problem since NOTHING about the two copies is different except the initiator and sharing direction. If I drag a file to a folder, why can't Vista assume that I am WAITING for that copy to be done and apply all resources to complete it ASAP. Did any of the product managers on Vista every use a computer for real work?