I have done a little searching for a good comparison between these two processors but to no avail. I am on a very tight budget but want to be gaming. i am realistic however and know it wont be on anywhere near top settings.
I have also looked on the CPU charts over on the main part of the site but they don't cover this cpu. So i am asking would i see a noticeable increase with the core 2 duo if it is even better that is? Or would i be better sticking with the cheaper 4600 or even drop to a 4200.
One more thing as well are the core 2 duo motherboards more expensive?
Go with the e4300 and no core2duo motherboards aren't more expensive.My suggestion is either go with the e4300 or e6600 if you can afford it, the difference between e4400 and e6600 is less than 100 bucks.
Both are decent cpus, but the e4300 is better. If they are similar prices then go for the e4300, you can buy the asrock 775dual-vsta mobo pretty cheap, and its good if you dont overclock. If you have a little more money to spend then go for a better quality board, but the asrock will do you if you dont intend to overclock or put in a high end video card.
I have done a little searching for a good comparison between these two processors but to no avail. I am on a very tight budget but want to be gaming. i am realistic however and know it wont be on anywhere near top settings.
I have also looked on the CPU charts over on the main part of the site but they don't cover this cpu. So i am asking would i see a noticeable increase with the core 2 duo if it is even better that is? Or would i be better sticking with the cheaper 4600 or even drop to a 4200.
One more thing as well are the core 2 duo motherboards more expensive?
Cheers for any help i receive
Tet
The E4400 and the x2 4600+ are fairly evenly matched in gaming(both win some). In most other apps the E4400 is faster, and it also has great overclocking capabilities. Yes C2D boards are slightly more expensive(on the whole), but there are good ones that can be had for cheap. If you aren't planning on overclocking, DDR2-533/DDR2-667(667 is adequate for O/Cing) is plenty...and keep in mind that fast RAM(DDR2-800) is of utmost importance in an AM2 system. Both are good fast processors, though. GL
Thanks a lot for your quick and detailed replies, i have noticed that on this forum people are very helpful since i joined, so thanks a lot again.
I am in the UK so i don't know whether the prices will be as close as $100, but because i am 16 and only have a Saturday job that is still a lot for me .
I am going to check some prices and get back to you and i will read that review you gave me 1Tanker
I dont even have a job, stop complaining I'm concentrating on my studies, next year is when I will earn some real cash, and I will likley do a whole system rebuild.
EDIT: How terrible is this new forums look? All squished up. And my bold sig doesnt show up as bold anymore...
I am on a very tight budget but want to be gaming. i am realistic however and know it wont be on anywhere near top settings.
Your underestimating those CPU's mentioned because they both have plenty of power for any game you will want to use now and for sometime to come. Performance is similar and you will not be disappointed with either.AMD's 4600+ usually retails cheaper in the UK.
Some of the posters have suggested buying a E4400 and overclocking. There is nothing wrong with overclocking because it's a boast for free, but pushing Overclocking to far can damage components. When ever one overclocks one should consider if one afford a new CPU if it all goes wrong? .
Everyone giving you advice seem to have misread your post. 8O 8O
Quote :
Hi everyone
I am on a very tight budget but want to be gaming.
Tet
I am fairly sure anybody knows the Intel architecture is supposed to be so superior. But if you are not over clocking, these two CPU’s are very close to each other and nothing wrong with either one.
To WJC i have read that article and it seems like the E4400 is the better choice for me because i do have a little experience in overclocking even if it was way back in Athlon Xp days. Correct me if i am wrong but isn't the 775 socket here to stay for a while, if that is the case then i would like to go Intel. I will, if i do overclock, consult the sticky in the overclocking section though.
The GPU i am looking to buy is the X1950GT for £85 and that is the top of my budget really.
I have done a little searching for a good comparison between these two processors but to no avail. I am on a very tight budget but want to be gaming. i am realistic however and know it wont be on anywhere near top settings.
I have also looked on the CPU charts over on the main part of the site but they don't cover this cpu. So i am asking would i see a noticeable increase with the core 2 duo if it is even better that is? Or would i be better sticking with the cheaper 4600 or even drop to a 4200.
One more thing as well are the core 2 duo motherboards more expensive?
Cheers for any help i receive
Tet
The E4400 and the x2 4600+ are fairly evenly matched in gaming(both win some). In most other apps the E4400 is faster, and it also has great overclocking capabilities. Yes C2D boards are slightly more expensive(on the whole), but there are good ones that can be had for cheap. If you aren't planning on overclocking, DDR2-533/DDR2-667(667 is adequate for O/Cing) is plenty...and keep in mind that fast RAM(DDR2-800) is of utmost importance in an AM2 system. Both are good fast processors, though. GL
A small correction: the memory type difference (800 vs 667) for the AMDs make only a tiny difference in results (less than that critical 10% difference that is just perceivable by expert users). But since 800 is so cheap now, you might as well get 800 for either Intel or AMD IMO.
btw, don't use out of date charts. Charts should include the x2 5600 for example in order to be useful (that is, to include the best processors to compare. imagine a chart with out 6400s or 6600s).
I have done a little searching for a good comparison between these two processors but to no avail. I am on a very tight budget but want to be gaming. i am realistic however and know it wont be on anywhere near top settings.
I have also looked on the CPU charts over on the main part of the site but they don't cover this cpu. So i am asking would i see a noticeable increase with the core 2 duo if it is even better that is? Or would i be better sticking with the cheaper 4600 or even drop to a 4200.
One more thing as well are the core 2 duo motherboards more expensive?
Cheers for any help i receive
Tet
The E4400 and the x2 4600+ are fairly evenly matched in gaming(both win some). In most other apps the E4400 is faster, and it also has great overclocking capabilities. Yes C2D boards are slightly more expensive(on the whole), but there are good ones that can be had for cheap. If you aren't planning on overclocking, DDR2-533/DDR2-667(667 is adequate for O/Cing) is plenty...and keep in mind that fast RAM(DDR2-800) is of utmost importance in an AM2 system. Both are good fast processors, though. GL
A small correction: the memory type difference (800 vs 667) for the AMDs make only a tiny difference in results (less than that critical 10% difference that is just perceivable by expert users). But since 800 is so cheap now, you might as well get 800 for either Intel or AMD IMO.
btw, don't use out of date charts. Charts should include the x2 5600 for example in order to be useful (that is, to include the best processors to compare. imagine a chart with out 6400s or 6600s).Sorry i didn't show a chart that presents (your cherished)AMD as the winner(due only to lower prices). He mentioned not seeing a chart with the x2 4600+ and the E4400against each other....that's what i gave him! If you read, you'll see i said the 4600 wins some....and both are fast chips. Don't fret, i didn't give AMD a bum rap here. Keep your fanboyish ego out of it. :x
A small correction: the memory type difference (800 vs 667) for the AMDs make only a tiny difference in results (less than that critical 10% difference that is just perceivable by expert users). But since 800 is so cheap now, you might as well get 800 for either Intel or AMD IMO.
DDR2-667 being 5 - 10% slower than DDR2-800 is not a 'tiny difference'. That is the equivalent of 1 or 2 CPU speed grades. An X2 4600+ with DDR2-667 performs like an X2 4200+ with DDR2-800.
In comparison, the 1 - 2% loss experienced by C2D is a 'tiny' difference.
.
I'm concentrating on my studies, next year is when I will earn some real cash, and I will likley do a whole system rebuild.
Keep your fanboyish ego out of it. :x
