MOBO 680i info please




Which is best ?




Warning, if you click on "see results", you won't be able to vote

Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : MOBO 680i info please
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hi all,

Been looking at getting one of the 680i mobo, but tbh am bit confused. I have read the review of them on this site and it seems the asus Striker extreme comes out on top.

Problem is i have seen alot of peeps reviews saying it has alot of flaws, bios problems, flawed fsb when overclocking etc.

The evga seems to have some nice comments and so does the abit. i also found a different asus mobo which seems to do the same as striker, but does it have the same problems as the extreme. Any help advice would be helpful as tbh im going NutZ :roll:

Boards

1 Asus Striker Extreme Quad Core motherboard SKT 775 nForce 680i SLI Intel® Core™2 Extreme / Core™2 Duo ATX Motherboard

2Asus P5N32-E SLi nForce 680 (Socket 775) PCI-Express DDR2 Motherboard

3BFG nForce 680 (Socket 775) PCI-Express DDR2 Motherboard

4 EVGA nForce 680i SLI Motherboard LGA775 Intel® Core™2 Extreme / Core™2 Duo ATX

5 Abit IN9-32x MAX PCIE WIFI Motherboard LGA775 nForce 680i SLi Intel Core 2 Duo / Quad processors Dual PCI-E ATX

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Two of your boards listed are both in fact the nVidia reference board (BFG, eVGA)... all reference boards are put out by board partrners in much the same way as they do their discreet graphics cards- a single contract manufacturer, all boards are identical, with a little light branding and differences in bundled parts.

There are in fact five reference board partners, besides the fact that they can be purchased directly from nVidia- eVGA, XFX, ECS, BFG, and Foxconn. As Foxconn is the only manufacturer on that list, it's a fairly good guess that they are building all of them. Biostar was rumored to be a reference board partner also, but nothing is on their website as of yet.

ALL REFERENCE BOARDS ARE IDENTICAL. They are made in the same factory, with identical components. Whomever is cheapest on that list the day you purchase is the one to go with, if you want a reference board. The reference boards all have the most mature drivers, and a reputation for being somewhat undercooled (esp. the northbridge) if in fact overclocking is what you want to do. A properly clocked reference board cools just fine.

There are also five 680i board partners that chose to do in-house designs around the 680i core logic- really four, from the enthusiast point of view, since the DFI lanparty offering is the 680i LT SLI.... not the one we want, we want the 680i SLI.

These boards are available from Abit, Asus, Gigabyte, and MSI.

Abit is perhaps the best priced non-reference board, Gigabyte is the most feature rich (quad GB lan, four eSata ports). MSI's version has onboard X-Fi, a motherboard first, with a controller chip provided by Creative Labs. Also worth noting is an ability to run four 16x PCIe lanes, in a 16x 8x 8x 8x mode... Abit has the 'guru panel', kinda neat... read about it on their website. You know about the striker and it's clone, so that about covers the non-reference boards.

Out of the non-reference boards, Im liking Asus the least. From a manufacturing quality standpoint, Asus boards seem afflicted with 'she was pretty last year' syndrome... I say this having fixed a pile of Asus based computers at work. Im going with the Gigabyte version, myself, once the price comes down. Asus support is ATROCIOUS, even if you are an OEM.

Hope this clears up any questions you may have.

Happy Building :D

Profile: stranger
More Information

thank for reply. have decided which board i want now, and price is how i picked it, as like you say they nearly all the same one way or another.

:lol:

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Quote :


Abit is perhaps the best priced non-reference board, Gigabyte is the most feature rich (quad GB lan, four eSata ports). MSI's version has onboard X-Fi, a motherboard first, with a controller chip provided by Creative Labs. Also worth noting is an ability to run four 16x PCIe lanes, in a 16x 8x 8x 8x mode... Abit has the 'guru panel', kinda neat... read about it on their website. You know about the striker and it's clone, so that about covers the non-reference boards.

Out of the non-reference boards, Im liking Asus the least. From a manufacturing quality standpoint, Asus boards seem afflicted with 'she was pretty last year' syndrome... I say this having fixed a pile of Asus based computers at work. Im going with the Gigabyte version, myself, once the price comes down. Asus support is ATROCIOUS, even if you are an OEM.

Hope this clears up any questions you may have.

Happy Building :D



That's very good info, thanks!

So I'm better off spending C$403 on a Gigabyte GA-N680SLI-DQ6 LGA775 NF680i instead of C$375 on a Striker? I'm thinking of a Q6700 CPU (to be released on July 22) and an 8800 GTX, and I'd like the ability to add a second 8800 GTX later. Would that work with this Gigabyte motherboard?

Thanks!

Profile: journeyman
More Information

disidious:

I would go that route, myself. Yes. the Gigabyte board would make a truly awesome SLI rig. Please note vista drivers arent available for SLI as of yet.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Thanks!

Yeah, I've been reading some reviews on the Gigabyte in the past hour or so and it looks brilliant.

I knew about Vista and SLI, but thanks for the warning anyway. I'll give Vista a try when SP1 is out and nVidia finishes the drivers. Hopefully that will happen before 2010 :roll:


Go to:
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

Gigabyte launches quad SLI-ready gaming platform

Published on January 16, 2007

Gigabyte United, a joint-venture of Gigabyte Technology and Asustek Computer, has launched its GA-N680SLI-DQ6 high-end gaming platform, featuring the Nvidia nForce 680i SLI MCP chipset, supporting Intel Core 2 Extreme Quad-Core processors, and delivering what the company calls Gigabyte 6-Quad technologies. Read more

Intel forecast to cut P4 price by up to 34%

Published on July 08, 2004

Intel will trim its Pentium 4 and Celeron D prices on 22 August, Taiwanese mobo maker sources have claimed, ahead of the anticipated launch of the 3.8 GHz Pentium 4 570. Read more

Mobo makers facing component shortages

Published on July 29, 2005

Motherboard makers are facing component shortages that may threaten their business during the high season in the second half of the year, industry sources said. Read more

Mobo shipments to drop 5-15 percent in 2Q

Published on April 26, 2005

First-tier motherboard makers Asustek Computer, Elitegroup Computers (ECS) and Gigabyte Technology expect their second quarter's shipments to fall 5-15 percent on quarter, according to the companies. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more

Stalker: Clear Sky - Is Your System Ready?

Published on September 30, 2008

Thinking about picking up the latest update to Stalker, but not sure if your graphics subsystem can handle it? Hang on as we take you through a performance tour and demonstrate how the game has been prettied up. Read more

Part 4: Avivo HD vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high-quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more