Our family needs a new computer. We have a decent system from last year (3200+, 7600GT, 2GB), but our second one is a 400Mhz K6 with 64 MB of RAM that likes to crash frequently (i.e. every time we turn it on and try to use it.) Needless to say, it is quite useless. We wish to replace it with something like our current one, which cost between 1200-1400 including OS and monitor. However, this is a horrible time to be buying computer with the transitioning of standards and introduction of new parts. I was wondering if people in the community could help me by suggesting what parts to get and also whether to go Vista or XP. The computer needs to last approximately five years, so bang for the buck is a high priority.
By equivelent, what do you mean? do you mean equiv. price point in today's market (so higher performing than your comparison rig)?
You could build an almost identical rig- same chipset, same graphics, same CPU, same amount of same speed memory... for less money now.
I would recommend strongly going with windows XP home. Vista is still quite buggy on some hardware, and there is no way to know for sure unless you try. Even building the exact rig someone else posted was a huge success isnt always going to work, due to BIOS revisions, driver revisions, component replacement... The exact same model number memory may in fact use different chips. Hardware is constantly revised.
Quite a few of us agree that Vista wont really be a useful product until microsoft issues the first service pack, and even that may cause some of us to take a second look, and reject it again.
My issue with Vista is it's memory management. An OS shouldnt use a 700mb footprint. A lot of this is prefetching, where the operating system tries to anticipate your needs, and retrieve the information beforehand. Until they improve this system, I want no parts of vista. nVidia driver problems are another negative.
You can check prices on newegg. Interestingly, in the above article putting in a high end video really boosted the gaming performance of the lost cost machine. When you're on a tight budget you really can't look at the leading edge/latest greatest because it's too expensive. Given you want it to last 5 years I'd go with 2GB of RAM. I agree XP would be better right now, you can always upgrade later. Going with an AMD X2 3800 with 2GB of RAM will be better than the 3200. I would seriously think about a Antec Sonata II case, which come with a good PSU. You could always go with onboard video that would save you about $100 given you wouldn't need a video card, which you could always get later but that would depend on what you want to do. Without a card you're at around $400 or less, with a card about $500. You could always go even lower but it's likely that new programs will require more resources so it makes sense to go with dual core.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.