hey, i have an 8800gts 320mb at 1440x900 res and i was wondering if i could play the dx10 games that are soon coming out like crysis and lost planet at max quality. thx
well from what we have seen. no, look at the thread that talks about the Lost planet benches, most GF 8800GTS's are playing with most on high but not fully MAXED out, as for crysis no one know yet, sadly we will have to wait and see. maybe its only the drivers or maybe it is actually the hard ware
The only current "Direct X10" title that's playable is Lost Planet, and it actually runs better under Direct X9 at the same graphics quality setting. We won't really know about Crysis until it comes out.
BFG 8800GTS 320 OC2 (580/1700)
AMD 4200+ (939) @ 2.9
AsRock 939Dual-Sata2 (the most amazing hardware I ever saw)
1.5 GB DDR400 Single-Channel (yeah, I know, will change this week)
Asus VW192 19" 1440*900
No AA - AF Trilinear - Everything HIGH except Shadows MEDIUM
XP DX 9.0c
Snow : 55
Cave : 29
Vista Ultimate 32-bit DX 10
Snow : 50
Cave : 26
Seriously, the 8800 GTS 320 is astonishing for the money, and value always must be considered when thinking about the 320.
And there is a difference for me in the DX10 version. I find it much more immersive, and generally smoother. I will take the fps hit every time.
there is somthing wrong with my PC i should try that again why i got so low framerates. i have Pentium D 3.00 GHZ. 3 GB Dual channel 667 MHZ memory. with EVGA 8800GTS 320 Superclocked with windows vista Ultimate
yep 1.5gb per channel. i have same sticks kingston 667MHZ 2x1GB and kingston 2x512MB and it's intel G965wh motherboard. i just added 2x512 stick 2 days ago. i ran lost planet test on 2 gb dual channel. i think i should run it again on 3 GB but i don't think it would help.
My GTS 640mb running maxed settings at 1920 x 1200 gets 20 - 25 fps just barely playable but runs it. Im thinking by the time Crysis comes I will need to use my one time step up program from Evga and get the GTX just to play it and a few other games, but for now everything else runs great.
From what I've seen in practical game-tests, the 8600-cards hardly perform better than 7600s - the massive reduction in stream processors from the 8800-cards cripples it, although I suppose it'd be useful in a HTPC because of the new hardware decoder chip
We've seen some unomptimised Crysis benches where 2 x 8800GTX in SLI were at 16fps (allegedly).
Note the word unoptimised.
However, whilst the final game will have much better frame rates, and play on more lower spec cards at both DX10 and DX9, there are still effects in DX10 that take even the most powerful DX10 cards to the limit. eg. In Alan Wake, the tornados allegedly had to be left out becuase it took a quad core and 2 x 8800gtx in sli to render them - it was in one of the tech videos. In Crysis the developers have said more features will be added in the future hinting that not everything can be activated at release.
At the moment if buying a card buy the most pwoerful you can afford but be aware that you might not get maxxed.
If you can wait, wait for the next generation of DX10.1 shader model 5 cards which should be out later this year as a die shrink as well as a redesign may give more fps.
In Alan Wake, the tornados allegedly had to be left out becuase it took a quad core and 2 x 8800gtx in sli to render them - it was in one of the tech videos.
You are wrong about that. Those videos you speak of as I remember watching them was stated that it was being powered by a quad core and 2 7900GTX's in SLI running under DX9 when it rendered those tornadoes.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.