AMD 785G: The Venerable 780G, Evolved
Tags:
-
Chipsets
-
AMD
Last response: in Reviews comments
AMD has enhanced one of its most popular integrated graphics chipsets with some compelling new features, creating the 785G. We examine this chipset, compare it to Nvidia's GeForce 8200/9400 and Intel's G45, and test several of its claimed capabilities.
AMD 785G: The Venerable 780G, Evolved : Read more
AMD 785G: The Venerable 780G, Evolved : Read more
More about : amd 785g venerable 780g evolved
macer1
August 4, 2009 4:21:18 AM
mcnuggetofdeath
August 4, 2009 5:23:18 AM
"refined architecture" ? To my knowledge, and please correct me if im wrong, all that was changed between the original phenom and the phenom 2 was the addition of more L3 cache allowing it to do more simultaneously and a die shrink allowing for higher clocks. That does not a refined architecture make. When AMD added an on die memory controller to their processors years ago they had made a huge advancement in architecture. Im sad to see them fall away from the performance crown. Here's hoping their new Bull Dozer architecture brings something genuinely intriguing to the table.
Score
-10
Related resources
- Difference between 780g and 785g - Forum
- Who is the best AMD 785G manufacturer? - Forum
- My games lag when i install AMD Gaming Evolved - Forum
- will i be able to use ("AMD Gaming Evolved") if i buy a amd cpu - Forum
- amd gaming evolved vs geforce experience which is worth it?! - Forum
mcnuggetofdeath
August 4, 2009 5:25:53 AM
anamaniac
August 4, 2009 6:37:19 AM
Very interesting.
A integrated GPU that can game. =D
Makes my lil Pentium D with a 4670 seem puny...
3.3GB/s memory bandwidth (single channel DDR2 533... though 2 sticks, it runs in single channel... damn prebuilts) also seems sad on my rig...
Good question. A dual core Atom with a 4200 integrated would be nice.
We all know Intel makes shitty mothebroards and AMD makes kickass motherboards anyways.
A integrated GPU that can game. =D
Makes my lil Pentium D with a 4670 seem puny...
3.3GB/s memory bandwidth (single channel DDR2 533... though 2 sticks, it runs in single channel... damn prebuilts) also seems sad on my rig...
macer1the real question is how would this perform if mated to an Atom processor in an nettop.
Good question. A dual core Atom with a 4200 integrated would be nice.
We all know Intel makes shitty mothebroards and AMD makes kickass motherboards anyways.
Score
-3
SpadeM
August 4, 2009 7:21:28 AM
apache_lives
August 4, 2009 8:27:52 AM
anamaniacVery interesting.A integrated GPU that can game. =DMakes my lil Pentium D with a 4670 seem puny...3.3GB/s memory bandwidth (single channel DDR2 533... though 2 sticks, it runs in single channel... damn prebuilts) also seems sad on my rig...Good question. A dual core Atom with a 4200 integrated would be nice.We all know Intel makes shitty mothebroards and AMD makes kickass motherboards anyways.
Native ram for a pentium d is PC4200 which has a max of 4.2gb/s per channel etc and the FSB has the max of 6.4gb/s
The Intel atom would most likely underpower any video card out there, and Intel does actually make a good reliable business platform where video performance is not required etc
Score
1
Anonymous
August 4, 2009 10:13:36 AM
aproldcuk
August 4, 2009 11:27:27 AM
This article raised a lot of questions for me. What about Hybrid Crossfire for example? What kind of cards can be used together with this new IGP? Is the discrete graphics card on standby if no performance is required? If no then how much extra outlet wattage is expected? And how much extra if actively in use? I'm interested in using the 785G solution in the 24/7 HTPC setup with the possibility to do occasional gaming as well. My current setup with 690G chipset and Athlon 64 X2 BE-2350 CPU draws around 50 watts most of the time and up to 90 watts under heavy load. Is it too much to expect similar levels from 785G and Phenom II X3 705e combo for example?
Score
1
wh3resmycar
August 4, 2009 12:10:04 PM
Pei-chen
August 4, 2009 12:30:08 PM
neiroatopelcc
August 4, 2009 12:33:15 PM
ArticleThere are two lessons to be learned here: first, if you really care about the environment, turn your PC off (or at least configure it to enter sleep mode) when you're not using it, and second, don't be afraid of purchasing a better processor for fear that it will cost you big money in power consumption.
Perhaps the next task could be a power comparison to tell us how long a computer needs to stand in active state to consume more power than turning it off and back on again (including starting msn,av software and a bunch of other stuff running in the background).
Anyway good article
Score
0
Anonymous
August 4, 2009 12:47:16 PM
McNuggetOfDeath: There were changes to the Phenom II architecture, 45nm is not what enabled higher clocks, it was architectural changes(mostly regarding internal latencies). There were also other changes as well that enabled higher IPC and smoother overall performance.
PS: Phenom II does support DDR3, there are only 2 models out of 12 that don't...
PS: Phenom II does support DDR3, there are only 2 models out of 12 that don't...
Score
3
Pei-chenGood timimg, I was wondering if 785G is better than 790GX or not yesterday. Thanks.
========
My take on it is except for some specific HTPC features, the 790GX is still the better of the two, especially if any gaming is involved. They compared an OC'ed 785G to a stock 790GX; what if they'd OC'ed the 790GX also?
And, lest anyone develop any false hope, the Intel IGP has once again been shown to be a toad.
Score
2
DarkMantle
August 4, 2009 3:19:13 PM
judeh101
August 4, 2009 4:11:55 PM
aproldcukThis article raised a lot of questions for me. What about Hybrid Crossfire for example? What kind of cards can be used together with this new IGP?
We concentrated on the new aspects of the 785G in this article; hybrid crossfire is exactly the same as it was with the 780G, that is to say it maxes out with a 3450 card.
Score
2
Ryun
August 4, 2009 5:16:34 PM
"At idle, the Phenom II X2 is drawing the highest load: 92 W on the 790GX motherboard. In contrast, the E7200 is drawing 68 W on the most efficient platform, Intel's G45. It looks big on the chart, but it's a difference of 14 W."
Nope, it's using a 24 W difference. I think that's why your numbers are different too. I get:
24 Watts * 24 hours = 576 WHrs / 1000 W/KW = .576 KWHrs * $0.15 cents/KWHr * 365 days = $31.54
Good article otherwise, thanks.
Nope, it's using a 24 W difference. I think that's why your numbers are different too. I get:
24 Watts * 24 hours = 576 WHrs / 1000 W/KW = .576 KWHrs * $0.15 cents/KWHr * 365 days = $31.54
Good article otherwise, thanks.
Score
4
Anonymous
August 4, 2009 5:17:36 PM
Quote:
refined architecture" ? To my knowledge, and please correct me if im wrong, all that was changed between the original phenom and the phenom 2 was the addition of more L3 cache allowing it to do more simultaneously and a die shrink allowing for higher clocks. That does not a refined architecture make. When AMD added an on die memory controller to their processors years ago they had made a huge advancement in architecture. Im sad to see them fall away from the performance crown. Here's hoping their new Bull Dozer architecture brings something genuinely intriguing to the table.That is incorrect, if that was the case, the Phenom II wouldn't benchmark so much better and it wouldn't overclock so much better. Just because it has the Phenom name to it, doesn't mean all they did was give it a bit more L3 Cache and call it a day. You could've given the original Phenom more L3 cache all day long and it wouldn't still ran like poop. Not necessarily poop, but just not as well as the Phenom II.
Score
-1
KT_WASP
August 4, 2009 5:34:53 PM
cleeveWe concentrated on the new aspects of the 785G in this article; hybrid crossfire is exactly the same as it was with the 780G, that is to say it maxes out with a 3450 card.
If this is true, then why does the Hybrid crossfire graphic on the first page show HD4350, HD4550 and HD4650 as compatible hybrid crossfire GPUs?
It makes sense.. the 780G used an integrated 3200-series GPU, so it was compatible with lower-end dedicated 3000-series GPUs. The 785G uses an integrated 4200-series GPU, so it should be compatible with the lower-end dedicated 4000-series GPUs.
Can you clear this up? I was also wondering what GPU's can be used as Hybrid crossfire with the 785G. I thought I knew from that graphic on page 1, but your response confused me.
Thanks
Score
4
aproldcuk
August 4, 2009 5:53:24 PM
cleevehybrid crossfire is exactly the same as it was with the 780G, that is to say it maxes out with a 3450 card.
Thanks for clearing it out, Cleeve! There is not much sense using Hybrid CF then. However, my original question still remains: how much extra wattage may one expect with mid-range 4600 or 4700 card added for example? Does disabling the device help here a bit more when not in use? Hope this is not too off-topic already...
Score
1
KT_WaspIf this is true, then why does the Hybrid crossfire graphic on the first page show HD4350, HD4550 and HD4650 as compatible hybrid crossfire GPUs?
It doesn't - it says "add faster graphics".
AMD specifically made it a point to let me know Hybrid Crossfire is no different than it was with the 780G.
Remember, the 4200 has the exact same number of shaders as the 3200. Hybrid Crossfire is limited by the power of the integrated GPU, and on that front the 3200 and 4200 are absolutely equals.
Score
3
Anonymous
August 4, 2009 7:43:00 PM
This board, to me, seems like an interesting option for a budget gaming system. I say this because, at least for the Asus ASUS M4A785TD-V EVO, you get both Hybrid Crossfire and Crossfire-X for $99.99.
According to the graphic on the first paid, the 785 chipset allows for Hybrid Crossfire with up to an HD 4650 card, so if you already have Vista, you have possible a decent budget video system.
For those of us holding onto XP, you can have a Crossfire (8+8)capable AM3+DDR3 board for $100.
According to the graphic on the first paid, the 785 chipset allows for Hybrid Crossfire with up to an HD 4650 card, so if you already have Vista, you have possible a decent budget video system.
For those of us holding onto XP, you can have a Crossfire (8+8)capable AM3+DDR3 board for $100.
Score
0
KT_WASP
August 4, 2009 9:20:24 PM
CleeveIt doesn't - it says "add faster graphics". AMD specifically made it a point to let me know Hybrid Crossfire is no different than it was with the 780G.Remember, the 4200 has the exact same number of shaders as the 3200. Hybrid Crossfire is limited by the power of the integrated GPU, and on that front the 3200 and 4200 are absolutely equals.
Ahh... Ok, I see it now. So, basically it is a HD3000 series GPU, but ATI pulled a "Nvidia move" and tweaked it slightly, then relabeled it so people think they are getting the next generation.... This is starting to get old with these company's pulling this crap....
Score
-3
KT_WASP said:
Ahh... Ok, I see it now. So, basically it is a HD3000 series GPU, but ATI pulled a "Nvidia move" and tweaked it slightly, then relabeled it so people think they are getting the next generation.... This is starting to get old with these company's pulling this crap....I hear you, man. it certainly doesn't help make things clearer.
Score
0
Anonymous
August 4, 2009 10:27:13 PM
KT_Wasp - I'd certainly agree if they did it with discrete mid to high-end GPUs like Nvidia does, but seriously, who upgrades their motherboard for the purpose of getting a newer generation IGP? Chipsets have always had evolutionary progression rather than revolutionary, especially the IGP part of it, they could easily cram more stream processors in it, but that would create thermal problems since putting a fan on a northbridge is rather taboo these days.
Score
1
aproldcuk
August 4, 2009 11:57:23 PM
ArticleEd.: After discussing with AMD earlier today, it would seem that eight-channel LPCM is not one of the features present in 785G.
Hmm... I wonder what's really behind it? Everybody talked about it weeks ago and AMD said nothing. Why say only now? This was supposed to be one major difference from 780G and now it's really hard for me to justify the planned platform switch
Score
0
megamanx00
August 4, 2009 11:58:08 PM
Seems like a 785G board would certainly be worth a few bucks more than a similar 780G board. Even though the Pentium D series is a good value, pairing it with a G45 board for a low end system makes it less so than say an Athlon II X2 and a 785G board. Good article, but it would have been interesting to see something like Hulu back since I think that's something an HTPC would be used for.
Score
2
inmytaxi
August 5, 2009 5:18:56 AM
JimmiG
August 5, 2009 8:09:11 AM
mcnuggetofdeath"refined architecture" ? To my knowledge, and please correct me if im wrong, all that was changed between the original phenom and the phenom 2 was the addition of more L3 cache allowing it to do more simultaneously and a die shrink allowing for higher clocks.
You're wrong, actually:
http://www.amdzone.com/index.php/reviews/60/11033-amd-p...
In addition to the bigger and slightly faster L3 cache and die shrink, the Phenom II got Path-based indirect branch prediction, Larger load/store buffering / larger floating point buffering / reduced MAB (missed address buffer) lifetime, 2x increase in core probe bandwidth, Improved LOCK pipelining and improvements to the Floating point register-to-register move instruction (FP MOV).
Of course, the larger L3 cache and higher clock speed are probably responsible for most of the performance improvements over the original Phenom.
Too bad about the missing multi-channel LPCM support in this chipset. This kind of confusion and incorrect information (which was published by many sites, not just THG) is never good PR.
Score
1
drealar
August 5, 2009 9:04:37 AM
I'm still confused about the sideport memory ever since the 790GX review.
1. What's the max memory capacity for the sideport in 785g?
2. Like 790 when it's in hybrid crossfireX, what's the memory configuration available? Like, can it still be (sideport+shared)+HD3450, or sideport+HD3450, or shared+HD3450?
1 thing that I notice is that idling with 790GX consumes only 68watts. So I'm guessing in test with 785g, it's higher because of the 1KW PSU? (The difference is 150W previous test setup is 850W). Previously Phenom X4 9350e, though I'm not sure if Athlon II should consume more because it's 1GHz faster (Old Phenom is a more power hungry CPU isn't it?)
Sorry if this sound like forcing to get some answers, I'm just too eager and excited the moment my RSS feed says "Updated: AMD 785G: The Venerable 780G, Evolved" which I've been waiting since CES 2009
1. What's the max memory capacity for the sideport in 785g?
2. Like 790 when it's in hybrid crossfireX, what's the memory configuration available? Like, can it still be (sideport+shared)+HD3450, or sideport+HD3450, or shared+HD3450?
1 thing that I notice is that idling with 790GX consumes only 68watts. So I'm guessing in test with 785g, it's higher because of the 1KW PSU? (The difference is 150W previous test setup is 850W). Previously Phenom X4 9350e, though I'm not sure if Athlon II should consume more because it's 1GHz faster (Old Phenom is a more power hungry CPU isn't it?)
Sorry if this sound like forcing to get some answers, I'm just too eager and excited the moment my RSS feed says "Updated: AMD 785G: The Venerable 780G, Evolved" which I've been waiting since CES 2009
Score
0
drealar
August 5, 2009 9:12:44 AM
Sorry for double posting but I guess most people will say the max capacity for the sideport memory is clearly 128MB. I'm just wondering what's the max capacity that manufacturer's can put? 512MB?
If 790GX gained 1~2fps from 128MB, so 512MB could give a ~10fps more? 512+512 = 1GB... sweet. Add up $20 maybe. Hahaha
If 790GX gained 1~2fps from 128MB, so 512MB could give a ~10fps more? 512+512 = 1GB... sweet. Add up $20 maybe. Hahaha
Score
0
invlem
August 5, 2009 1:52:24 PM
Until a viable (ie not $200 sound card) solution appears that can bitstream DTS-MA or Dolby TrueHD I have no reason to change my HTPC from the current 780g setup.
Until then, optical audio out + hdmi video out seems to be what I'll be sticking with in the near future. I refuse to pay $200 for a sound card, which then restricts me to a single piece of software (TMT) for my bit streaming needs.
Until then, optical audio out + hdmi video out seems to be what I'll be sticking with in the near future. I refuse to pay $200 for a sound card, which then restricts me to a single piece of software (TMT) for my bit streaming needs.
Score
0
drealarI'm still confused about the sideport memory ever since the 790GX review.1. What's the max memory capacity for the sideport in 785g?2. Like 790 when it's in hybrid crossfireX, what's the memory configuration available? Like, can it still be (sideport+shared)+HD3450, or sideport+HD3450, or shared+HD3450?1 thing that I notice is that idling with 790GX consumes only 68watts. So I'm guessing in test with 785g, it's higher because of the 1KW PSU? (The difference is 150W previous test setup is 850W).
I've never seen a hard limit published as to the memory capacity for sideport, but I've never seen anyone put more than 128MB on a board. Sideport can still be shared with system memory in CrossfireX.
For power usage, AFAIK the total wattage of the PSU shouldn't matter so much, but the efficiency of the PSU should. The Thermaltake Toughpower 1200 is a very efficient PSU.
Score
-1
drealar
August 6, 2009 1:08:20 AM
Thanks Cleeve, though I'm still concerned about the PSU since most reviews are showing better efficiency when setting up a low power system with low wattage 80Plus PSU. What happened to Tom's FPS220 or what ever the model is from Fortron? I really admire that PSU but unfortunately never been available here.
Another thing is, does CrossfireX RAM works something like system RAM? I mean is it better to have 2 same RAM type (like DDR2 or DDR3) with the same capacity (256/256, or 512/512). It's just that it's quite hard to get a 512MB HD3450 these days, let alone the model itself. Wonder if ATI will ever upgrade Hybrid CrossfireX, since crossfiring with the chipset is kinda unlikely to happen with the low stock of HD 3450.
Another thing is, does CrossfireX RAM works something like system RAM? I mean is it better to have 2 same RAM type (like DDR2 or DDR3) with the same capacity (256/256, or 512/512). It's just that it's quite hard to get a 512MB HD3450 these days, let alone the model itself. Wonder if ATI will ever upgrade Hybrid CrossfireX, since crossfiring with the chipset is kinda unlikely to happen with the low stock of HD 3450.
Score
1
genored
August 6, 2009 1:55:39 AM
xeliman
August 8, 2009 6:58:17 AM
Anonymous
August 10, 2009 6:04:18 AM
Score
1
Anonymous
August 10, 2009 12:25:21 PM
Anonymous
August 10, 2009 8:54:34 PM
> The 785G has stepped up video quality with UVD 2.0,
> compared to UVD 1.0 in the 780G and 790GX chipsets.
I understood that the 780G had UVD2.0 support:
http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showpost.php?p=53818&pos...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVD2
Are you please able to confirm this one way or another?
> compared to UVD 1.0 in the 780G and 790GX chipsets.
I understood that the 780G had UVD2.0 support:
http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showpost.php?p=53818&pos...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVD2
Are you please able to confirm this one way or another?
Score
1
bryce55
August 13, 2009 8:45:16 AM
bryce55
August 13, 2009 8:46:07 AM
Anonymous
August 13, 2009 11:16:36 AM
Anonymous
August 13, 2009 4:44:22 PM
- 1 / 2
- 2
- Newest
Related resources
- AMD Gaming Evolved Raptr App Discussion Forum
- AMD Gaming Evolved recording? your thoughts? Forum
- AMD's Gaming Evolved App can record gameplay Forum
- amd gaming evolved Forum
- Does AMD Gaming Evolved APP really optimize games? Forum
- Far Cry Blood Dragon ($10) Code (AMD Gaming Evolved: Never Settle Offer) Forum
- Layout of GA-785GMT-USB3 AM3 AMD 785G Forum
- AMD Gaming Evolved: Never Settle Game Key Forum
- AMD Gaming Evolved in Far Cry 3 Forum
- AMD 785G VS NVIDIA 780A SLI Forum
- AMD X3 720 BE, 785g, Budget, $350 Forum
- Help, black border around TV screen when using my AMD 785G HTPC graphics! Forum
- Recommended AMD 785G motherboard for HTPC and undervolting? Forum
- Amd 785g hybrid crossfire Forum
- 785G AMD board Forum
- More resources
!