We got hosed on the picture end of things, BUT I will say that all of these boards except the overpriced Asus P5N32-E SLI Plus and the way too cheap ECS board interest me alot.
I've been waiting for the Intel P35 stuff to get a new board but I can't find out whether or not the NVidia chipset will accept the 45nm processors or if the 680i boards need to be in SLI to use their physics processor slot(the 8x slot in the middle).
Anyway all of these boards look pretty sweet to me even if they don't run 16x, 16x. Most cards don't saturate all 16 lanes anyway so 8x, 8x is good enough. I know I'm probably not going to go SLI anyway, but since the 650i ULTRA boards are within 20 bucks of these anyway I might as well get something that's more upgradeable.
BTW, nice review (aside from all the images missing ). Overall very fair. I may have missed it (I'll go re-read it), but there were a few things not mentioned...
- in addition to it's other cost-cutting measures, the ASUS P5N-E board is 'narrow' and only has 6 board mounting holes (instead of 9). This might be usefull in smaller cases, but it also leave the board 'unsupported' (and springy) in places like where you need to press down to install memory, etc.
Both Ultra ATA connectors are found near the bottom of the board facing forward to provide clearance for long graphics cards. These are typically used for optical drives in the upper bays of most cases, so cable management will be slightly impaired.
The P5N-E SLI chipset and memory locations actually would have left room to move these upward on the board, but Asus chopped off the section of PCB that would have supported rerouting these connections in another cost-savings move that makes the board approximately one-half inch narrower than competing designs. That same move leaves the front 2.5" unsupported by case standoffs because the board doesn't quite reach the next row of them.
- I'm not sure why the ASUS 'Plus' board was included in the roundup, but I appreciate that you did at least explain that it doesn't use a 650i chipset.
The 650i SLI chipset is Nvidia's solution for buyers who want SLI on the cheap. We benchmark several 650i boards against the high-priced 680i SLI reference mobo.
It's just a cheap way to get SLI support. You can't do SLI on an Intel chipset without cracking drivers, and even with the crack the 16x/4x split for dual-slot P965 boards wouldn't support it properly.
that would depend on whether or not 1 FPS is worth $10 to you (GTS = $120 more and 12 FPS better).Well, like my situation for example. The x1950 PRo is a good card, but it isn't cutting it at a few games. My board is crossfire capable so I have 2 options. Get an 8800GTS for $250 or more, or get another x1950 for $130. 2 x1950 Pros score on average 12FPS less then the GTS 320... which makes more sense at the current time?