sorry if this has already been posted

here ya go

windows media: http://www.gametrailers.com/player [...] mv&pl=game

quicktime: http://www.gametrailers.com/player [...] ov&pl=game


and in the jungle:

windows media: http://www.gametrailers.com/player [...] mv&pl=game

quicktime: http://www.gametrailers.com/player [...] ov&pl=game



i dont know about you, but DX9 looks pretty damn good aswell

I watched those videos yesterday and though the dx10 improvements were good I came away thinking the video's action favoured dx10.

In the hunter video they show a longer clip where the hunter sends more debris flying when it steps on it. In the dx9 video that event doesn't take place making it hard to compare.

In the jungle video I don't know if it is a result of dx10 but the character seems to shoot down more trees for effect.

would have been better if it was the exact same thing being done. but oh well...

lol, that was funny.

Good, but they should have been doing the same in each videos.

tbh i couldn't give a damn abotu crysis. also i won't take anythnig as fact until i see independant reviews when it is released.

after far cry i don't trust crytek to do a good job and won't until i have played it myself.

again and again
dx10 is god and dx9 is a dinosaur ,,bla bla bla
and they choose crysis to make the difference...how convenient
ok evolution will go on it's way but one question arise
do the dx9 code programmers reached the final wall in dx9 and dx10 will make them happy again....?or it is a intermediary stage until dx10.a release?

possibly. isnt there some talk about a dx10.1 (or DX11) which will need another hardware upgrade??

and what happened to all that pixel shader 3 hype??? Only a few games use it

Sm3 will begin to get used more and more as hardware get newer and newer. of course now Sm4 is around, it will be the new SM3.

possibly. isnt there some talk about a dx10.1 (or DX11) which will need another hardware upgrade??

and what happened to all that pixel shader 3 hype??? Only a few games use it
well it seems to me that game producers know how to milk our pockets
besides new hardware and new software to create almost realistic landscapes and games...well at first glance is awesome but...boring.
seriously the new games are totaly cool and so on but ..don't have what old games had.
my humble opinion
anticupidon

if not mistaken i heard that they already are looking to implement sm..5

Also, i have yet to see a video of crysis that shows of the great A.I they've been touting. In all the videos they just stand there and get blown to bits. Maybe i've been looking at them the wrong way or great A.I means they just stand there frozen in fear as most people would when a big guy with a gun attacks you, but in that regard i'm not impressed.

I do like the pretty pictures though

lol

yes you have a point great A.I. to me is like that you have the gun and fire power, enemies use camouflage ...one distracts you and the rest of the pack...well there are a gazilion of scenarios but....a real life scenario and dx1o textures and we have a winner but ..until that we have to wait

Is nice!.............DX9 not so much. DX10 nice!


*High Five Crytek!*(High-Fives.......Big grins and thumbs up)

The game looks awesome on both fronts.

It obviously looks better on DX10, but I think that's a big case of Benchmarketing.

Does anyone here honestly thing DX9 is incapable of portraying rain drops? Or Flamey debris? Or even motion blur? I can think of a dozen games right now that have motion blur.

Doesn't really matter. I imagine by the time this game finally hits the shelves 80% of us will be using a DX10 solution in some form. Mid-range or High-end.

It's a shame that none of the effects that are shown require Direct X10.

What? Far Cry was pretty good.

You know what, I have had farcry since it came out and STILL havent finished it

I always end up formatting and forgetting to backup my saves and then I'm back at the start again, so i start playing something else.

Farcry was great game imo.