I generally think taking a company private is an excellent move...assuming the appropriate cash reserves are in place or provided as part of the buyout. And In the interest of competition I would love to see AMD go private...and dream of all dreams I'd LOVE to see Intel go private...I know...market cap is too large for that to happen...;-(
My reasoning: It is far too easy for companys to specifically make decisions in an effort to create shareholder value (short term) via increased stock prices. (No I am not saying it is easy for them to drive prices up but rather it is easy to get caught in the trap of making decisions specifically with the intent of driving stock price up (short term).
The problem I have seen is this creates a tail wagging the dog scenario where the company is focused on "Perceived Value" rather that real, long term value to the company. It is unfortunate but public corporations decisions are definitely influenced by how shareholders will respond. Definitely not saying that it is the only factor..but keep in mind "perceived" vs "real" value. And from purely a business management perspective, isn't it optimal to make decisions on the basis of what will benefit the business itself first? Rather than attempting to influence a number that is largely out of your control (stock price)?
IMO Public companies most critical measure is their "Perceived Value". This encompasses their history, future potential, current performance, and countless additional factors... represented by their stock price. While a private company is largely influenced by their core investors expectations of return, which is typically tied more to overall return on investment rather than the short term needs of a fickle market.
That said, Private companies do have their own internal pressures, but they tend to be driven by common measurements of business performance as opposed to the stock of public companies, which is influenced by a number of factors, many of which are not in their control.
Chris