Post your Company of Heroes DX10 Benches

COH has gone DX10!
So, how goes it for you all? Post the average fps and the min/max from the built in performance test and your settings.

Shaders: DX10
Everything on highest except trees which were on medium.
AA set at x4

AMD X2 5600+ at 3.08Ghz
2x 8800GTS 640Mb (Stock Speeds)
3GB Ram

Max - 65
Min - 1.9
Avg - 41.3

give us screenies give us screenies .. can u actually tell a differience on dx9 and dx10 in company of heroes?

I think what everyone's really after is comparisons between DX10 and DX9 regarding both your image quality and your Frames

can you tell me what fps u had with dx9? much better when you can compare em ..
can u tell the difference on dx9 and dx10? maybe show some screens?

DX9 was about 7 frames faster all around ON BOTH SINGLE CARD AND SLI MODES. Depending on the battle, I can tell the difference more or less. Rule of thumb - the more large explosions and tanks fighting the better DX10 looks. The German V-1 detonation is spectacular!

And it is especially satisfying when there are a couple enemy units caught in it.

EDIT: Weird problem with screenshots. Every shot in the folder is corrupt and Windows gives a BSOD when I try to open them. :? Will work on tonight and in the morning.

NVIDIA just released new DX10 SLI Drivers with fixes for COH. Will download and update FPS scores.

ACK! With the new drivers, the game wont even start in SLI!!!
Single card FPS performance is much better:
Max - 81.3
Min - 30.0
Avg. - 63.2

I would also like to see some screenshots.I am installing my RMA 8800gts so I will download it and see.

Uh, I don't know about you guys but it seems to me the water looks better and the performance is better in DX9.

Gee, this all seems kind of weird. Perhaps you people are right though, might be driver issues.

It kind of makes me wonder if people will prefer to play Unreal Tournament 3 in DX9 or DX10...?

DX10 ten must die. Costing consumers kazillions. I wonder if Crysis will be delayed again.

I wanna ask you guys something - whats the real benefit of DX10 over DX9 ???? What I understand, is that its more pixels per calculation because of the way the programming is handled (ie. more efficient so you can get better graphics for the hardware). With Core 2, it seems like our CPUs can do anything these days.

If a game is programmed to do a lot of calculations, and you have the chip to do it, then it should look nearly as good. I've seen the Crysis demos, and the DX9 looks nearly as good as the DX10 versions. Yes there is a diffs with repect to some lighting and cooler explosions, but if you look at DX9, the way objects move is similar because they are programmed to do so. The chips can handle it. Those physics visualizations are cool not because of DX10, but because the game is programmed to do them. My chip can do them (and DX10 cant hurt to help it along), but its damn close enough.

I think CPU capacity over ran the need for DX10, and thats why we havent seen mass adoption. When games/visualizations become so intense that our chips cant handle it and the calcs need to be more efficient, then DX10 will really come into play.

We havent even hit capacity limitations with Conroe. What about the new Quads dropping to $266 in July - everyone will get one. I think DX10 has a much longer time frame to go before we really need it. My $0.02.

http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33892384

Read that a guy has a nice review