That amount could be what he received last year, and not his standing total. Or it could be some of the shares that vested this year. Who really knows.
@n19ntmare -
Intel executives sell their shares all the time, even when it doesn't look good for the company. I remember when Barrett sold upwards of 100k in shares, when Intel was floundering, and although it looked bad, we realized that those shares might expire (stock option type), or maybe he was padding his retirement. Either way, it's not all that uncommon to see VP, Presidents, and CEOs cash out their shares/options.
I doubt Henri's options are expiring. The standard is 10 years and he hasn't been at AMD that long.
I would agree that one shouldn't read much into it. Henri is a doofus PR guy that is unlikely to be able to make an intelligent decision with the inside information that he has.
Hmm...you are right. He joined AMD in 2002, so those weren't options. I guess he did what a lot of us do when we get stocks at work, a "quick sale". That is...we get the stocks, and sell them almost immediately. I've been doing that for the last 2 years now.
But I still wouldn't go nuts about him selling shares. Only reason it was even mentioned is because he had to sell the shares with a special form (insider trading form, or something like that), since he has direct influence on the company.
@Bluntside -
While AMD is hurting, I don't think a dual socket platform is the way to "right the ship". Getting products out the door in a timely manner, especially to Tier 1 OEMs and the channel, is more important that any performance/speed crown. Get the customers that felt betrayed back, and show them that the delays aren't norm for the course. With them swimming in debt, they cannot just tout a platform for high end enthusiasts, and expect to regain market share. They need to show upcoming products, and release them on time. That's the only way they can really get back on course. As for the benches, and dual sockets - Intel does have the V8 system to go against the 4X4, but either system is pretty worthless, imo. Sure it's nice to have that much power, but at what cost? Higher memory prices for the V8's FB-DIMMS, or higher power costs for the 4X4 power usage? Heck, the MacPro's dual Xeon is a nice piece of hardware, for workstation use, but how many average users would need that much power?