Tom's Hardware Forums » Storage » Hard Disks » Best optimization of two HDD without RAID?
 

Best optimization of two HDD without RAID?

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Best optimization of two HDD without RAID?
 
Profile: journeyman
More Information

I'm a first time builder and have one 500 GB HDD, and am considering purchasing an 80 GB HDD. Assuming I will not set up RAID (don't see the point), what is the best way to optimize two HDD? I read some posts about putting the OS and applications on the smaller HDD, and using the bigger one for data storage. My question is - how does the OS know to use one HDD to boot, and the other for data storage? What's the best way to set all this up?

Please forgive my slight ignorance on this subject... :)

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

I think it's a good idea to split on 2 hd.

Basically, in the BIOS of the motherboard you can specify the boot order, you will be able to specify which HD to look at first see if there's a OS.

Once the HDs are detected the computer will look for the Boot.ini file on the HD where the OS is install.

So all you have to do is make sure both HD are detected. Then you boot with your windows CD and choose which HD you want to use for the OS(pretty obvious when you got a 80gig and a 500gig..).

I also suggest moving the SWAP file to the "storage"HD and also to redirect the My Documents to that HD. This way, a OS re-install/re-imaging is really guick

Profile: addict
More Information

Quote :

I'm a first time builder and have one 500 GB HDD, and am considering purchasing an 80 GB HDD. Assuming I will not set up RAID (don't see the point), what is the best way to optimize two HDD? I read some posts about putting the OS and applications on the smaller HDD, and using the bigger one for data storage. My question is - how does the OS know to use one HDD to boot, and the other for data storage? What's the best way to set all this up?

Please forgive my slight ignorance on this subject... :)



size doesn't matter. Speed does. Put the OS on the FASTER HD and install all of your speed-insensative background applications to the other HD. Normally you would also make this "other" drive your storage drive as you bought a big cheap HD to use for storage and it was slow but where you put your storage doesn't effect performance unless you're accessing the storage while doing some other drive-latency sensitive task. The only think I can think of where you would be doing this is listening to music while loading game levels. From an absolute performance perspective you don't want your storage to be on the same drive as your OS, swap, or time-sensitive apps but if you're choosing from a given set of hardware always put your OS on the fastest drive.

So, it's not the *size* of the second HD that you're thinking about buying that's important it's the speed. You've got storage fairly well covered with the 500gb so pick out something fast and don't worry about size. www.storagereview.com is my favorite review site right now. If you currently owned some slow 80gb drive I'd tell you to get a fast 500gb drive and install your OS on it or to buy 2 new drives (but obviously that would cost more).


Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Storage » Hard Disks » Best optimization of two HDD without RAID?
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

CeBIT 2008: Areca Unified Serial Controller with integrated SAS-Expander

Published on March 05, 2008

Areca, a Taiwanese company specializing in high-end controller cards, is displaying a few new products aimed at small and mid-sized businesses as well as freelancers at CeBIT. Read more

Sequence's MTCMOS technology reduces leakage power

Published on November 03, 2004

Sequence said that it had reached a milestone in its recent power optimization efforts using its MTCMOS (Multi-Threshold CMOS) technology. Read more

Thermaltake introduces NAS-RAID drive storage system

Published on July 28, 2006

Thermaltake introduced its Muse N0001LN NAS-(Network Attached Storage-) RAID drive storage system. Read more

Sabio rolls out multi-TeraByte consumer storage box

Published on January 26, 2006

San Diego-based Sabio Digital has introduced a consumer-level storage device capable of storing one teraByte and up worth of data. The Sabio Storage CM-4 box sports an Intel Xscale 400 megahertz processor and four hard-drives. The box runs on an embedded Linux operating system and is compatible with either PCs or Macs. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Atom, Athlon, or Nano? Energy-Savers Compared

Published on October 03, 2008

We compared Intel’s Atom 230 and VIA’s Nano L2100 processors hoping to find the best product for low-power applications. VIA is in the vanguard of performance. Is this enough to beat Atom? Read more

Interview: Bigfoot's Killer NIC, Exposed

Published on October 02, 2008

Since its release, the Killer NIC has garnered a reputation for being an extravagant and largely unnecessary add-on for the do-it-yourselfer. Seeking additional insight, we approached the card's designer. Read more

Seagate's 1.5TB Barracuda: Bigger And Better?

Published on October 02, 2008

Seagate is the first hard drive vendor to offer a 1.5 TB drive in the 3.5” form factor. Meanwhile, WD sent us its RAID Edition 3 (RE3) drive. We tell you which is the best HDD choice today. Read more

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more