Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Multimedia Card Recommendation

Multimedia Card Recommendation

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Multimedia Card Recommendation

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Help, My head is too full of reading all the specs, etc. Looking for a recommendation for a graphics card for multimedia use (watching movies, photo editing, some video, internet surfing, and home office including some AutoCad, very little gamming).

Putting together a new system with ASUS P5K Deluxe, 2 GB DDR2-1066, 22" LCD @ 1680 x 1050. Considering Vista Home Premium (don't shoot me).

Most all the graphics card reviews I find are all based on gamming results. Will results for multimedia be similar? Thinking about an 8800 GTS 320MB card. Is this OverKill?

Thanks for replies,

ArubaBob

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

I don't really know how reliant AutoCAD is on a GPU. Setting that aside, I would say the 8800GTS is definitely an overkill.

I would think the 8600GT is more than enough for your needs. You can even drop down to the 8500GT.

If you plan on watching HD-DVDs or Blu-Ray DVDs you will need a monitor and video card that are HDCP ready. That's on top of a HD-DVD drive.

If you need a HDCP ready video card, then look for one in the 8600GT series. There are no such cards in the 8500GT series.

Reply to jaguarskx

then again why go for 8xxx if one does not use them fully? :P
that's just my opinion, as I really think one could get some alot cheaper gpu, and still be able to play that 'very little gaming' with somewhat ok graphics... maybe not the newest games or those that are still in the future. but why not save maybe ~200$ going for a real cheap somewhat good gpu and then use that 200$ + 50-500$extra when that must have game appears...

I think of myself as a gamer, went for 8800gts 640mb, it allows me to play future games (should atleast) maybe not on full graphics but still, also going for overkill is kinda satisfying. But if I wouldn't have wanted to play HL2 at great framerates and graphics I would have went for a shitty card and waited untill a good game would come out. (the real reason for my new comp was faster file opening, and processing and Supreme Commander witch needs a somewhat fast C2D (imo, so I went for an e6600) o yeah and then the promise of getting spore 2007, delayed as far as I know of...)

these ideas are coming from no expert in this area, just a few things I myself though up and though I could share isntead of just lurking around here. also that is why I do not put any examples of could be cards, but you could always check out the 'best graphic cards for the buck' or w/e that artcle on TH was called...

Reply to ErskaConti

Quote :

then again why go for 8xxx if one does not use them fully? :P



I recommended a 8600GT over a 7600GT because from my search a 8600GT with HDCP costs less than a 7600GT with HDCP. Go figure.

Reply to jaguarskx

I've been trying to find information on the Gigabyte 8600GT's Silent Pipe II passive cooler - any info?

Reply to mark204
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Multimedia Card Recommendation
Go to:

There are 417 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them