I was just wondering about a simple way of matching game requirements with computer performance: a single score to be calculated for any given computer, so that you can say: to be able to play game X, you need a computer with a score of Y, and to play it at full detail, a score of Z.
Do you have any suggestions to generate such a score? I think it would imply the comparision with a reference computer. Or maybe do you know about some web that runs similar tests.
I've been disappointed with the Futuremark comparisons of late - they pitch you up against mostly similar hardware, but still throw in quad cores against dual, and they also seem to ignore clock speeds too.
Thanks for your answers! I'm aware of the Futuremark benchmarks, thanks for the Aquamark suggestion. the point is, you never find references to 3DMark scores when a game is reviewed (if you know about sites doing it, please tell me), just in hardware reviews. So to have an estimation of the performance of your computer in any given game, you have to rely on the opinion of people in forums (your computer sucks, forget it) or download a demo. I think it would be useful to have some way to match the requirements of a game with the specs of a computer, using 1-3 numbers.
The problem with that is that it is really hard to tell how an actual game will perform on any given system. There are too many factors that affect how a game looks/performs on any given system.
The best that they can do is give a recommended system specs and say that the game will perform reasonably well on that.
Eventually down the road (who knows when) you will see new games come out with a recommended WEI score. This is something that is just starting with Vista. Here's a link for info:
I'm thinking specially about people looking for laptops: they are becoming more and more popular, but system requirements and reviews are oriented to desktop computers (not strangely, as we all know a laptop is a bad investment for gaming, but anyway a significant amount of people owns a laptop and plays games on it), and performance of laptop components is difficult to match with its desktop counterparts (will I get the same performance with a 8600M GT that witn a 8600 GT? Probably not).
Well, Tom's puts out a monthly 'Best Graphics Card For Your Money' article, and at the end of it it compares things of that nature. It shows comparable parts n their performance group. It's kind of interesting and definitely worth checking out if you want to compare mobile graphics chipsets.
Thanks for the info, the hierarchy chart is a very nice addition as it takes mobile chips into account. I didn't read the "best cards for the money" articles lately.
Thanks for the info, the hierarchy chart is a very nice addition as it takes mobile chips into account. I didn't read the "best cards for the money" articles lately.
Yup, I stumbled onto it only yesterday. This list is kinda' interesting IMO.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.