Crysis-online.com

only speculations.

We'll see...

If those statistics come close to being true, we could be seeing the 8800GTX getting roughly 60-65FPS on 1280x1024. In DX10 for that fact. Not bad.


But like others have said, this is only speculation.

So if I get this straight it is speculated performance for a card that was speculated months ago but has actually never come to market and may never.

Actually for the speculation to ever reflect an actual card it would now have to be "HD2x00xtx".

Actually for the speculation to ever reflect an actual card it would now have to be "HD2x00xtx".

is there a next-gen difference between the xtx and the xt? They are with the same set, only difference might be the clocks and memory

That's based simply on them looking at screenshots and guessing.

damn 2900xt is kicking 8800gtx's ass

Whose speculation is this? The developers? Or some kid that is good with photoshop?

Hmm, 7900GT matching a X1900XT and SLI 7900GT beating Crossfire X1900XT..... I doubt it.

Considering that Crysis partnered with Nvidia and the that the xtx from AMD was slower than the xt model, oh one last thing there is no ATI any more, I would say this is BS.

ati is the brand of the card, amd is the maker

As soon as I saw the X850 below the X1600, I stopped looking at it.

Pure speculation, pure B.S.

For some reason that list gave me an image of two knobs sitting at a dinner table with DD dice rolling to make up the list. :?

I'll take mine with a pinch of salt please
I have a x1650 card in one of my rigs with similar system specs and would be confident that 40 fps is way out at 1024x760.

Mactronix

If those are real then the 8800GTX is shortlived. I don't consider those figures acceptable performance.

Not to sure how much i trust them though.

EVEN IF this list was right, the game hasn't been optimized yet and I am sure that when the game finally comes out an X850 wont get 10 FPS in low.

OMG that's funny. "based on a dual core processor @ 2 Ghz and 2GB of memory" What, did they take a D805 and underclock it or did they use an ancient 939 system with ddr1? This is so lame. Where is the whole test setup? You got a link to where you found these?

The E4400 is 2.0GHz ...

So is my 3800+. That's not the point. You don't just put 2ghz dual core by a bench and expect everyone to be happy with it. If it's real I want to at least see on which mobo and know what processor they were running to compare to my own. It's like the stupid a$$ ads from pc shops lately. 3Ghz intel processor. WTF? They put 3Ghz celrons in there and the people are under the influence that it's a killer pc.

get your eyes checked

says XTX not XT (even that is speculation at its limits)

lol, good one

Calm down if you check the post again you will see that it is only speculated performance (as in not real)
So it would be kind of pointless being specific about system specs for what basically comes down to a best guess.
Mactronix