Urgent: Which of these 2 CPUs Am I suppose to get? Mine brok

[pixel]

I just broke my cpu.. dont ask how =[

but which of these 2 am i suppose to get i built my computer a year ago
i have this motherboard

MSI K9N Platinum
http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?model=K9N_Platinum&class=mb


So from these 2... Which one am i suppose to get? I notice one is 65nm the other is 90nm
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Productcompare.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010340343%2050001028%201051720996&page=1&srchInDesc=3600%20x2&bop=And&Order=REVIEWS&CompareItemList=N82E16819103046%2CN82E16819103760

 

[darious00777]

Either or, friend. AMD has gone for a while now, if it fits the socket, it works. Least that's what I keep getting told.

Go with the 65nm one. Slightly less power (under 1%), for a bit less electrical usage and heat output.

 

[mjam]

I'd go with the Brisbane due to the larger cache, but I don't know what it's OC capabilities are if you're going that route. Just make sure your BIOS version supports it.

 

[aevm]

That's funny, the 65 nm version runs at 1.9 GHz, the other at 2.0 GHz, according to that newegg page. Does that make sense? Wasn't the die-shrink supposed to allow higher frequencies?? Anyway, the 65 nm has a bigger cache, that should help. My vote goes for 65 too.