Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
WinField <doghouse@operamail.com> wrote in news:NOOQd.99585$mt.64865
@fed1read03:
> Today I looked at an ATI (9600?) video/tuner card for the computer. I
> figured the cheapest, quickest way to try-out HDTV was on the computer.
>
> The only monitor at my disposal is my NEC LCD computer monitor. It's
> natural resolution is 1280 x 1024.
>
> I'm still not clear about whether my computer monitor will display a
> HDTV signal from the ATI card.
>
> If anyone can clarify this for me, I'd appreciate it.
Most video cards are up to displaying an HDTV-quality image on any
display hardware capable of the required resolution. But for over-the-
air tuning, you need a card with an ATSC tuner in it. I'm not sure any
of the ATI cards except the HDTV Wonder actually have that (and I've
heard that it doesn't work all that good). My 9550 can put OUT 1080i
from computer-based sources, including DivX and WMV files, but I have
nothing that can capture HDTV from my satellite source. Some of the HDTV
cards with ATSC tuners can do that from over-the-air broeadcasts.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Thanks, Dave. Your answer really cleared up some fogginess on this
issue for me.
Cheers,
Winfield
Dave Oldridge wrote:
> Most video cards are up to displaying an HDTV-quality image on any
> display hardware capable of the required resolution. But for over-the-
> air tuning, you need a card with an ATSC tuner in it. I'm not sure any
> of the ATI cards except the HDTV Wonder actually have that (and I've
> heard that it doesn't work all that good). My 9550 can put OUT 1080i
> from computer-based sources, including DivX and WMV files, but I have
> nothing that can capture HDTV from my satellite source. Some of the HDTV
> cards with ATSC tuners can do that from over-the-air broeadcasts.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
"WinField" <doghouse@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:NOOQd.99585$mt.64865@fed1read03...
> Today I looked at an ATI (9600?) video/tuner card for the computer. I
> figured the cheapest, quickest way to try-out HDTV was on the computer.
>
> The only monitor at my disposal is my NEC LCD computer monitor. It's
> natural resolution is 1280 x 1024.
>
> I'm still not clear about whether my computer monitor will display a HDTV
> signal from the ATI card.
>
> If anyone can clarify this for me, I'd appreciate it.
>
> winf
You might also try ebay, using search terms like this:
(myhd,accessdtv,hipix).
I saw 10 items, looks like they sell for around $140.00 to $250.00.
I've had all three, they all work pretty well.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
David (davey@home.com) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> You might also try ebay, using search terms like this:
> (myhd,accessdtv,hipix).
> I saw 10 items, looks like they sell for around $140.00 to $250.00.
Unless you can get a board for the low end of that range, just buy them
new. The MyHD MDP-120 sells for $229 from Digital Connection, and $290
with the DVI daughter-card. For $249, the MDP-130 that has a 5th gen
ATI receiver chipset and can also tune unencrypted QAM is a great deal.
--
Jeff Rife | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
| \ / against HTML e-mail
| X and USENET posts
| / \
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Jeff Rife wrote:
> David (davey@home.com) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
>
>>You might also try ebay, using search terms like this:
>>(myhd,accessdtv,hipix).
>>I saw 10 items, looks like they sell for around $140.00 to $250.00.
>
>
> Unless you can get a board for the low end of that range, just buy them
> new. The MyHD MDP-120 sells for $229 from Digital Connection, and $290
> with the DVI daughter-card. For $249, the MDP-130 that has a 5th gen
> ATI receiver chipset and can also tune unencrypted QAM is a great deal.
>
The MDP-130 may be called 5th generation but it does not touch LG 5th
generation according to MIT themselves.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Bob Miller (robmx@earthlink.net) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> The MDP-130 may be called 5th generation but it does not touch LG 5th
> generation according to MIT themselves.
Source, please.
Actual tests have shown that this chipset reduces multipath issues quite
a bit.
--
Jeff Rife | "This? This is ice. This is what happens to
| water when it gets too cold. This? This is
| Kent. This is what happens to people when
| they get too sexually frustrated."
| -- Chris Knight, "Real Genius"
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Jeff Rife wrote:
> Bob Miller (robmx@earthlink.net) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
>
>>The MDP-130 may be called 5th generation but it does not touch LG 5th
>>generation according to MIT themselves.
>
>
> Source, please.
>
> Actual tests have shown that this chipset reduces multipath issues quite
> a bit.
>
I think I mentioned the source, MIT, the company that makes the MDP-130.
They have told me that the ATI chip they are using does not have the
performance of the 5th generation LG chip.
The reason they told me was that I wanted to test the ATI based MDP-130
against an STB prototype they have using the LG 5th gen and they told me
there was no reason to since they already had done so.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Bob Miller wrote:
> Jeff Rife wrote:
>
>> Bob Miller (robmx@earthlink.net) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
>>
>>> The MDP-130 may be called 5th generation but it does not touch LG 5th
>>> generation according to MIT themselves.
>>
>>
>>
>> Source, please.
>>
>> Actual tests have shown that this chipset reduces multipath issues quite
>> a bit.
>>
> I think I mentioned the source, MIT, the company that makes the MDP-130.
> They have told me that the ATI chip they are using does not have the
> performance of the 5th generation LG chip.
>
> The reason they told me was that I wanted to test the ATI based MDP-130
> against an STB prototype they have using the LG 5th gen and they told me
> there was no reason to since they already had done so.
>
People here might accept that as a source, but since you have no
credibility, I don't think anyone will.
Try citing a published source of this information.
--
Matthew
I'm a contractor. If you want an opinion, I'll sell you one.
Which one do you want?
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Matthew L. Martin wrote:
> Bob Miller wrote:
>
>> Jeff Rife wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Miller (robmx@earthlink.net) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
>>>
>>>> The MDP-130 may be called 5th generation but it does not touch LG
>>>> 5th generation according to MIT themselves.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Source, please.
>>>
>>> Actual tests have shown that this chipset reduces multipath issues quite
>>> a bit.
>>>
>> I think I mentioned the source, MIT, the company that makes the
>> MDP-130. They have told me that the ATI chip they are using does not
>> have the performance of the 5th generation LG chip.
>>
>> The reason they told me was that I wanted to test the ATI based
>> MDP-130 against an STB prototype they have using the LG 5th gen and
>> they told me there was no reason to since they already had done so.
>>
>
> People here might accept that as a source, but since you have no
> credibility, I don't think anyone will.
>
> Try citing a published source of this information.
>
Give them a call.
They are using LG 5th gen for their new receivers. That should tell you
enough but they do have a phone #.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.