Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

SAMSUNG 226BW 22" Question

Tags:
  • Monitors
  • Samsung
  • Components
Last response: in Components
Share
June 27, 2007 7:33:40 AM

Hi All,
I posted a while ago about wether to buy a chimei 22" monitor. Some one recommended the Samsung 226bw 22" and i'm going for that one.
I did a bit of research and from peoples posts if the monitor has an 'A' at the end of the model number then the panel has been made by another company and isn't as good as 'S' Samsung made panel.
Well i went shopping and the only ones i could find had a 'C' on the back. Now i'm guessing that this means it's a Chimei made panel? Is this correct and if so are they as good as the Samsung panels?
Does anyone have one of these monitors and can comment?
Thanks as always for any advice.
Panface.

More about : samsung 226bw question

June 27, 2007 8:25:53 AM

nope, they aren't as good, and since the panel is the same as the one in the monitor you wanted to get before, get the chimei... or an aoc 223vw or a 210v the both have the "a" panel :p 
June 27, 2007 9:19:08 PM

Well, at least samsung makes good on their warranties. My 226bw, which is a C panel, has a purple strip of dead pixels running down the right side. Currently, the replacement on the way. Also, behardware.com did a review on the three types of panels and found that C was the worst, A still wasn't good, and S is the best. I also read somewhere that samsung has stopped using panels from the other two plants, so I would assume that if you buy any monitor manufactured late this month or after (mine made in april) that it would be an S panel.
Related resources
June 27, 2007 9:46:54 PM

I got one of the "C" panels yesterday, and I am returning it tonight. The color accuracy problem can be fixed(sort of) but the light bleed on top, bottom, and right in the middle of the screen cannot. Others have said it's not that noticeable with the lights on, so I must have gotten a really bad one because you can see how bright it is on the edges and in the center even with the lights on and my desktop up. :cry: 

So yeah, get the "s" panel if you can, but avoid the "c" panel like you would avoid battery acid on your tender areas. 8O
June 27, 2007 9:58:21 PM

and if you can't get them, get a AOC monitor, its the happy medium
June 28, 2007 12:15:54 AM

Well I have to post somewhat of a retraction. I did go return the panel, but I decided to roll the dice one more time and exchange it instead, in the hopes of getting an "s" panel.

Of course when I got it home it was a "c" panel again. :roll:

BUT I plugged it in just for the sake of being thorough, and this one has no noticable light bleed at all. It was still a bit off in the color, but I can fix that to acceptable standards with the profile I downloaded last night.

So apparently I did get a particularly bad "c" panel the first time, and some of them are very nice with proper calibration.

Good Luck :wink:
June 28, 2007 1:26:26 AM

I am soooooo happy. Looks like I am getting the samsung again. YAH!!!!!!!!!!!!
June 28, 2007 1:31:15 AM

Thanks all for your help. One last thing do any of you have a link to a good site which explains the best settings for this monitor, tips and tricks etc?
Cheers,
Panface.
June 28, 2007 3:08:49 AM

does this apply to the 206bw's also?
June 28, 2007 3:28:12 AM

I ordered a 226 from Newegg about a month ago, got a C panel with one stuck pixel and some really horrific backlight bleed. I sweet-talked them into RMAing it, and wouldn't you know it, wound up with a C panel again. However, this one had barely noticeable bleed as well as great color accuracy. Couldn't be happier. So I'd say the C's aren't horrible, they're just crazy inconsistant as far as quality goes.

Sorry biserx, misclicked on reply there, I believe the 206's are the same way.
June 28, 2007 3:59:52 PM

I bought the Samsung 226bw today and it was a new shipment in, on the back it has no reference letter at all. No A,C,W,A or S. Don't know if this means it's a Samung panel or not but i can tell you it was the best money i've spent in a long time. Everything looks fantastic, amazing colour and gaming's got a whole new lease of life.
If your thinking of getting one of these I say 'Do it'
June 28, 2007 4:41:45 PM

I thought about the Samsung 226BW and I was an arm's reach from buying, but I looked over and saw a Westinghouse L2410NM 24" and was immediately taken. Much brighter than the Samsung and higher resolution. The Samsung has a faster response time and better monitor controls, but the specs were so close that the addition connectivity ports on the Westinghouse won me over. Before you jump to that Samsung check out the Westinghouse I mentioned.
July 13, 2008 6:56:20 PM

I just swapped my 204B Syncmaster out (20.1 in) for the 22 in 226BW that everyone is talking about. I went through the same uncertainty trying to figure out what is so bad about the "bad" ones and what is so good with the "S" panels. I was dreading picking it up (it was a direct swap from Samsung at their suggestion which I agreed to after research). Well I got it hooked up and the first thing my friend and I thought was hmmm.... a bit what's the word? washed out. But it didn't look bad, just "off" somehow. I figured it was just the colors and would have to fiddle with it.

I am typing to you 10+ hours later after fiddling with it to get it the way I want or should have it. First thing is I am running 2 x GT KO 7900 Geforce cards SLI setup. I don't know if that's relevant to MagicTune working (or in my case not working) or not. I installed/uninstalled every single download they had of MagicTune. No luck with MagicTune. I read the posts that suggested turning off background processes and start up programs. I did that, but I may have neglected one final try at that. I digress. I gave up on MagicTune. At this point I had hosed my contrast/brightness all to hell with my Nvidia Control Panel messing around (I did not see the restore default link at the top right... doh). So with terrible black desktop and distorted colors at this point I was feeling discouraged.

I was actually trying to pull up the hidden status menu that tells you what monitor you're dealing with. I don't know what any of you experienced, but my manual monitor controls would not allow me to change brightness/contrast and some color calibrations. I am assuming this would be due to MagicTune somehow, but I'm not sure. I was getting somewhat freaked out thinking that if I can't change it on the monitor and I can't calibrate it with software I'm f*xx0red. I think after I hosed everything up and uninstalled MagicTune for the umpteenth time I managed to be able to change brightness/contrast which you need to bring up hidden menu.

I found out later I had an A panel if I am to believe a post from someone who claims to know the difference between the last digits of CLA vs. CAA. Anyhow, after reading a very lengthy article (one of many) someone broke down an in depth analysis of how MagicTune works and how NATURAL COLOR works and they mentioned OSD as well. The reason Natural Color is in caps is because the article said it was possibly better than MagicTune albeit somewhat comparable. When MagicTune doesn't work you don't have too many options aside from (in my case Nvidia) and your monitor manually (if it works). That for someone like me is very hard. Knowing where to stop with color changes all manually is a bit daunting.

After all my messing around I used a combination of only Natural Color (which has you squint your eyes and get red, green & blue to a very specific contrast) & the manual monitor functions. I also read up on some of the features of the monitor like MagicColor which can add various kinds of vibrancy to the monitor. I believe although i could make changes with Nvidia Control Panel in my case I didn't use it because I switched back to defaults after hosing it up.

You're probably wondering what the end result of all this crap is.. It's gorgeous! The black is black as the abyss and the colors are yummy. One guy was describing the different "MagicColor" on board OSD settings None, Demo, Full & Intelligent. You have to play with them to see for yourself. The guy who posted about it said Full was too intense and made colors seem to bleed and that intelligent was less intense, but ultimately if you wanted everything set up in a very specific way to not use them. BS. There are differences between them, but in my case I find Full to be my setting of choice. Colors just pop at you crisply but no bleed whatsoever. Clarity is there in full.

I didn't follow someone else's guide on how to calibrate a certain way I just figured it out. I believe I have it where I want it. I suppose someone could come along and show me how much clearer I could make it, but I'd be surprised. It's very very nice. And if the post I read about which panel is which is correct I have A. I love it. Just food for thought in rambling I stayed up all night fashion.

My new 226Bw is also refurbished and my warranty is up in about 2-3 months. I can't complain though I had my Syncmaster 204B for nearly 3 years and just got a tiny row of dead pixels but otherwise the monitor was working great. This is an awesome exchange as long as it holds up. I absolutely love it. Just get your hands dirty and figure it out. I'm sure there may be bad monitors, but I imagine most of these can just be calibrated like mine was. Good luck!
!