Archived from groups: comp.sys.handhelds (More info?)
I am confused- please help
I am having to decide between x50 (mid range) or 4150. X50 is 10% dearer- is it better value over 4150?
4150 limitations: no Flash ROM card slot, slower processor, lower built in memory (32ROM), 1 year old already. BUT it has better battery life, light weight and great looks.
X50 limitations: terrible battery life, heavier, has limited number of available accessories (e.g. sync & charge cable @expansys etc). BUT it is faster and has 2 expansion slots.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.handhelds (More info?)
Dear uncertain,
thanks for writing me...
No, really. I have had quite a few handhelds already and at least I'd be
120% for lightweight and battery life. Most propably you would hate yourself
in 6 months if you choose ugly and heavy thing in to your pocket.
-pekka
"pan via PocketPCJunkies.com" <forum@PocketPCJunkies.com> wrote in message
news:0410111ac04c433aa3192d4d5c7eca87@PocketPCJunkies.com...
> I am confused- please help
>
> I am having to decide between x50 (mid range) or 4150. X50 is 10% dearer-
is it better value over 4150?
>
> 4150 limitations: no Flash ROM card slot, slower processor, lower built in
memory (32ROM), 1 year old already. BUT it has better battery life, light
weight and great looks.
>
> X50 limitations: terrible battery life, heavier, has limited number of
available accessories (e.g. sync & charge cable @expansys etc). BUT it is
faster and has 2 expansion slots.
>
> Which one should I go for? Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> Message posted via http://www.pocketpcjunkies.com
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.