<b>What sort of internet access do you have at Home? (measuring Downstream speeds)</b>
<b>Anyone claiming they can see the difference
between 450 and 500 FPS in Quake3 deserves to
be severely beaten with a rock. </b>
Australia really does suck... but tel$tra must be making a fortune... specially with their 500Mb monthly cap services! (uploads included, 15c/mb over cap charges)
<b>Anyone claiming they can see the difference
between 450 and 500 FPS in Quake3 deserves to
be severely beaten with a rock. </b>
I don't and will refuse to believe a home DSL can do 14MB/sec.
That is not even possible, ADSL's physical limit is not that, and CAN'T, since no ADSL so far goes beyond 100Mbps.
Flame you should at least be honest than bragging with lies.
--
This post is brought to you by Eden, on a Via Eden, in the garden of Eden.
I think he meant 14 Mbps, but I don't even think that is possible with DSL. So you're saying you can download at 1,750 kBps, meaning you could download a gig file in less than 10 minutes?
-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>
What's the bandwidth of fiber optics? If it wasn't for the dotcom bust we'd probably be cruising the web at light speed.
<font color=red>
<A HREF="http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?dhlucke" target="_new">If you were to have sex with your clone would that be considered incest or masturbation?</A></font color=red>
Fibre Optic cannot be tapped into, very high security.
<font color=blue>No interference from outside sources, immune to electrical disruption.</font color=blue>
Fibre Optic can be extended 20 times further than copper.
<font color=blue>Fibre optic is estimated to have a life span in excess of 20 years.</font color=blue>
A single fibre pair can carry over 600,000 voice circuits compared to a telephone line which can carry 2 voice circuits.
<font color=blue>As it's made of glass, it won't corrode.</font color=blue>
Virtually unaffected by outdoor atmospheric conditions.
<font color=blue>Absolutely no electrical radiation from a fiber cable.</font color=blue>
Much smaller and lighter in weight than a wire or coaxial cable with similar information carrying capacity.
As for the bandwidth of fiber...
"The current state-of-the-art optical fiber system is known as SONET/SDH, level OC 192. It uses a singlemode fiber that transmits 129,024 voice channels at 9.953 gigabits (billion bits) per second—which is more than 120,000 times the information of electronic signals over copper wire."
"Each fibre link initially has the potential to handle transmission rates of 160Gbps. They are ready to support <b><font color=red>1.6Tbps</font color=red></b> using 160 channel dense wave division multiplexing(DWDM) technologies.
Is that fast enough?
That's 32,000,000 times faster than 56k, 3,200,000 times faster than 512kbp/s and 400,000 times faster than 4Mbp/s.
<b>!!!!!</b>
...and they can't roll out ADSL at any speed in this country. Hah!
If someone knows of anything faster, please post, as it's quiet interesting.
<b><font color=blue>~ <A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/index.php?act=ST&f=41&t=324&s=58e94ba84a16bedfebbf0f416d5bac48" target="_new">My System Specs</A> ~<font color=blue></b>
Oh and FYI, that's about 200GB per second download speed.
In short, it's too fast for your PC.
BTW all calcs are in 1000s and not 1024s, as I don't have an extra day for the sums, nor the willpower for such boredom. I, like the HDD manufacturers intend to give the best sounding results.
<b><font color=blue>~ <A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/index.php?act=ST&f=41&t=324&s=58e94ba84a16bedfebbf0f416d5bac48" target="_new">My System Specs</A> ~<font color=blue></b>
Our little town has nothing but dialup. They're talking about getting cable or dsl in 2004, but I don't think it'll happen. I'm just glad that the college has a wicked ass t3. Although, at the moment the 15 k/s d/l cap is lame
Ya where I live I was waiting for years to get cable, as I was stuck with 56krap, and about 6 months ago it finally came. Man, I don't know how I lived without it... It sucked because while I was waiting, I was told several times that it was good to go for DSL, but every time I scheduled installation it always came back as unavailable. Earthlink even billed my ass $100, even though I was declined. That was gay. But, cables here so alls good... 1500/128 is pretty sweet. Good price too at $67 a month.
-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>
At the moment I'm using a cable service that really sucks, with occasional dropouts and nowhere near the bandwidth I had with my old cable service, though it's still better than dialup. I'd go DSL if I lived a 1/4 mile closer to the node, but I'm just outside, so I can't have it. I need to move back to New Haven, or at least somewhere with better service.
Jarrett
<A HREF="http://forumz.tomshardware.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=faq¬found=1&code=1" target="_new"><b><font color=red>Join The THGC Music Project</font color=red></b></A>
poor guy... least you can get toms bet broadband is mighty expensive in your country too!
<i>"Revenues were less than robust"</i> - QWEST
<i>"The company applied its accounting policies incorrectly"</i> - WORLDCOM
<i>"Certian financial adjustments may be required"</i> - AOL+TW.
<i>"Revenues were less than robust"</i> - QWEST
<i>"The company applied its accounting policies incorrectly"</i> - WORLDCOM
<i>"Certian financial adjustments may be required"</i> - AOL+TW.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.