Sometimes I am a little slow but I still don't get it, yes compared to the 320MB GTS it is a better card, I understand that, and compared to the 640MB GTS it is a very competitive card, price is the factor at this level and resolution at which you operate at, okay so I understand this so far as well. But in the end something’s that still confuse me is how people look at the two cards and say that the 8800 can not improve any more, why did they stop making drivers are is just more fanboy talk? Another thing I don't get is how all of a sudden a nicely performing card, that was not burdened by all the driver issues and such the 2900 had, is now such a bad card, or less of a card than it was before the latest revision of the 2900 drivers. To me, when you release something it should come out right the first time, we know that doesn't happen but hey, at least try to get close to the mark. From the improvements the 2900 has made with its drivers I would say that tells me one thing, when it was release it was a piece of $hit and they should have held off, I can't speak for anyone else but I hate driver issues, and given the problems around the 2900 from the start, I still couldn't recommend it over the 640MB version of the 8800GTS, that is unless it was significantly cheaper and you were on a tight budget. Not that the issues changes my purchase at this point as I bought the 8800GTX before all this came to past but still. Anyway these are just some thoughts that I am trying to de-conflict these days.