ok, the 60 fps thing is because of vsync, maybe thats affecting your 3dmark scores as well? look for the disable vysnc button in the nvidia control panel, or just leave it on
you really cant see a difference with more than 60fps, and the vsync eliminates "ripping" of an image (e.g. 60hz refresh rate and 200 fps results in images becoming distorted, its better to keep vsync on IMO goodluck.
Actually its quite interesting, he might be right. The manual for his motherboard suggests that you should use 1&2 or 3&4 for to achieve dual channel operation!
MNX1024 is your motherboard a gigabyte GA-M59SLI-S5?
A memory bandwidth benchmark might be slightly more definitive.
Answer. Yes it is normal to miss that much performance when you compare different systems.
You have to remember that 3Dmark is not a purely graphics benchmark and you are comparing the overall system for what i believe is a different processor. The toms hardware benchmark uses an Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 where as you have a AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ according to the 3D mark analysis.
Benchmark results for systems with even the slightest difference will start to vary.
I think I found the reason why I'm having a low fps on source or even a low score in the benchmark. When I look at Nvidia Monitor, it says that my GPU memory is 900mhz, but on newegg and foxconn's site, it says that the card is 1800mhz. I mean, normal 8800gts is 1600 anyway. Anyone know how I can fix that problem?
Ok than, I guess the benchmark score is pretty much solved. What I'm being trouble by is that I'm getting 60fps on Counter Strike Source when others are getting 120fps and 220fps with the same card.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.