Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.verizon (
More info?)
Of course we all know what will happen. Everything will settle out of the
court system because Verizon Wireless doesn't want the bad publicity.
"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:8LTJd.3825$m31.53202@typhoon.sonic.net...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <jzwick3-C47601.06462020012005@news1.west.earthlink.net> on Thu, 20 Jan
> 2005 12:46:27 GMT, Jack Zwick <jzwick3@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <KzJHd.2935$m31.36642@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> > John Navas <jnavas@sonic.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> In <10uumg3kst0e23b@corp.supernews.com> on Thu, 20 Jan 2005
02:13:05 -0500,
> >> <xman@thedripper.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >"John Navas" <jnavas@sonic.net> wrote in message
> >> >news:ws2Hd.2573$m31.31231@typhoon.sonic.net...
> >>
> >> >> I see no evidence of that.
> >>
> >> >From your responses, you're just a dick. Plain and simple.
> >>
> >> From your responses, you're just a rude jerk. Plain and simple.
> >>
> >> >You really could
> >> >care less if Verizon Wireless advertises certain functions of a
Bluetooth
> >> >phone, but then cripple those same functions it advertises.
> >>
> >> It isn't advertising any crippled functions.
> >>
> >> >If you want to
> >> >actually blame the consumer because they didn't test it within 15 days
and
> >> >completely disregard the false advertising still stands then you're
pretty
> >> >much on the side of big brother and really wouldn't stick up for
anyone if
> >> >they had a problem.
> >>
> >> There is no false advertising.
> >
> >Thats what the lawsuit will determine, not your pontification.
>
> Fair enough: Thus far there hasn't been a showing of anything even
remotely
> close to false advertising, just vague claims. You can only pursue a case
for
> misrepresentation by showing: (1) statements with alleged
misrepresentation
> and (2) showing the representations in those statements to be false or
> misleading. Since Verizon has disclosed what the Bluetooth implementation
> would do, and since there hasn't been any showing of actual
misrepresentation,
> there can't be a case for misrepresentation.
>
> --
> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>