Yeah, I know the question may seem pretty stupid, but...
The X1950XT is a really nice card for its price (I could get one for about 200€). Right now, it can handle almost anything at high quality, and DX9 compatibility will be around for years.
On the other hand, the 8800 series still seem to lack the power to run DX10 stuff nicely. In other words, if I bought a 8800GTS today (about 280€), it wouldn't be because of it being a DX10 card, but just because it is faster than the X1950XT in DX9. Also, the 320mb factor could become a bottleneck in the near future when it comes to running games with AA / AF on, and I'm not even considering the 640mb model; it's much more expensive and my monitor will be a 20" TFT with a native resolution of 1400x1050.
So, considering that the performance difference in DX9 between these two cards is noticeable, but not abysmal at all, wouldn't it be a nice option to spare those 80€ and start saving for a card that is truly DX10-viable when they become available?
What would you do?
The X1950XT is a really nice card for its price (I could get one for about 200€). Right now, it can handle almost anything at high quality, and DX9 compatibility will be around for years.
On the other hand, the 8800 series still seem to lack the power to run DX10 stuff nicely. In other words, if I bought a 8800GTS today (about 280€), it wouldn't be because of it being a DX10 card, but just because it is faster than the X1950XT in DX9. Also, the 320mb factor could become a bottleneck in the near future when it comes to running games with AA / AF on, and I'm not even considering the 640mb model; it's much more expensive and my monitor will be a 20" TFT with a native resolution of 1400x1050.
So, considering that the performance difference in DX9 between these two cards is noticeable, but not abysmal at all, wouldn't it be a nice option to spare those 80€ and start saving for a card that is truly DX10-viable when they become available?
What would you do?