Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > dual and quad core

dual and quad core

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - dual and quad core

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

ok im little new to this, so correct me if you think im am wrong (im sure many will :kaola: )

Using the dual core or quad core system is the manufactures way of saying hey we really can't increase the performance on a cpu, we are stuck. Lets put in 2 core and throw the problem over to the software end. In my mind its like using 2 engines to increase output on a car. Does it work? yes, but its pretty inefficient.

ok lets hear it!

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Pretty much. They hit a Gigahertz wall and improving the IPC takes time and money and can only go so far. There's three ways to increase speed, go fast (clock rate), go efficient (IPC) or go parallel (multi-core), parallel is the easiest way for the CPU manufacturers to go right now.

Reply to fredgiblet

also having 2 cores helps out with background tasks and severs and high end workstations have had more then cpu for a long time.

Reply to Joe_The_Dragon

its more like adding 4 more cylinders to a i-4 to make a v8

by the way they are not stuck the keep reducing the size of each transisitor and increasing the number of them - that why they can pack more core's per chip

Reply to dragonsprayer
- 0 +

raze wrote :

ok im little new to this, so correct me if you think im am wrong (im sure many will :kaola: )

Using the dual core or quad core system is the manufactures way of saying hey we really can't increase the performance on a cpu, we are stuck. Lets put in 2 core and throw the problem over to the software end. In my mind its like using 2 engines to increase output on a car. Does it work? yes, but its pretty inefficient.

ok lets hear it!



They can increase the performance in the traditional way, look at how much better the core2 line was over the Pentium D, it's not saying we're stuck, it's saying we have a way to dramatically increase performance by adding more cores, let's do it. Would you really prefer a single-core processor knowing you could have a multi-core?

Reply to jt001
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > dual and quad core
Go to:

There are 579 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them