Any experience with Bigfoot or other Outboard NICs for Gaming?

Tom's has a generally favorable article on Bigfoot's Killer NIC products. http://www.tomsguide.com/us/killer [...] -1083.html

The concept seems logical, in that it is common for dedicated/discrete versions of peripherals to outperform on-board counterparts (e.g., video, sound, etc.). I understand the benefits generally, but for me, the point of diminishing returns comes in way before the $250 price for the product.

I read that other dedicated, outboard-chip-based NIC boards also help--but at a lot lower price. Anyone have any experience with them? Would other boards provide tangible benefits, even if lets say 50% of what the Bigfoot provides?

E.g., this one was referenced in a NewEgg review for the Bigfoot, and for ~$24 it is a no brainer to try as an upgrade to my MoBo ethernet connection. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6833106121

Thoughts? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?

your better off spending the $$$ on a faster cpu/video card or more ram, better cooling for overclocking, or even a faster hdd/s, but in todays systems, every little bit counts - eg more cache, higher fsb, ncq, ht, sata2 - alone there all pathetic and dont seem to perform any better but together they make a system feel more robust and perform better.

I get the feeling Intel and Realtek will add its features into an upcoming budget/mainstream chips

lower overhead too i believe - we need to see Intels' vs Realtek and others vs (Wallet)Killer

All i know for certain is when using BST from multiple clients to an AMD Semperon (64) 3000 with a Realtek Gigabit PCI card the cpu overhead was the first limit - at ~40% (~400mbps) it reached 100% and wouldnt go any higher - wonder wether this card would do any better in this situation...