Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > General Storage > Moore's Law and Hard Drive Failure

Moore's Law and Hard Drive Failure

Forum Storage : General Storage - Moore's Law and Hard Drive Failure

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Moore's Law says that the number of transistors on an integrated circuit doubles every two years.

According to Wikipedia: "Almost every measure of the capabilities of digital electronic devices is linked to Moore's Law: processing speed, memory capacity, even the resolution of LCD screens and digital cameras."

Toshiba came out with a 1.8 inch hard drive that carries 160 GB which is pretty impressive.

My question is, since they are now getting "353 Megabits per square millimetre (228 gigabits per square inch)", at what point does Moore's law affect hard drive failure?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

I'm pretty sure Moore's Law originally referred to the exponential increase in the number of transistors in a CPU.

Keep in mind that you're citing a Wikipedia article.

Reply to rodney_ws

ahhhh

magnetic platters don't have anything to do with transistor density.

This is almost like saying "when will the drinking age limit in the USA effect hard drive failures"

Reply to predaking
- 0 +

How small can the magnetic platter get without it breaking down?

Reply to chuckt

If there is an absolute size limit to magnetic platters they will get around this by switching to a different method, such as flash memory. But I'm not sure Moore's law has or will apply to the size of magentic drive platters despite what someone said in the Wiki article.

For one thing they can put more data on a given sized platter as technology progresses, thus increasing the amount of data per platter, without shrinking the drive, or else using a smaller drive and getting the same amount of data on it.

BTW, is Moore's law still applying to processors. Seems like processor speed has stagnated a bit and they are instead getting more performance by improving their design and using more cores.

Reply to notherdude

Moore's Law still applies is not that they cant increase the speed its that they cant get the heat issues and power requierments under control.

Reply to cyberlan

There is talk about hard drives aligning 1 atom at time for storage, so without a better understanding of quantum physics than we have now I would say that is the limit...

------------------------------ Old Enermax Case G. Skill DDR2 1000mhz 4gb(2x2gb)
PC Power & Cooling 610 Silencer EVGA 8800GT 512mb
Gigabyte P35-DS3R 2x WD1600AAJS RAID0
Intel Core 2 Duo e8400 @3.6ghz Windows Vista Premium 64bit
Reply to jwolf24601
- 0 +

Yes, Moore's Law is still valid. His law has nothing to do with the speed of the proccesor. It has to do with the number of transitotrs which is still doubleing every couple of years. Case in point there is now multiple cores in the same space instead of one core.

Reply to hsarc

Moore's Law has absolutely nothing to do with hard drives or hard drive failure.

------------------------------ ASRock X58 Extreme - Core i7 920 - 6GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3 1600 - Sapphire 4890 2GB - Creative Xtreme Gamer - 4-80GB WD in RAID0 on HighPoint RR 2310 as OS drive - 1-320GB WD scratch drive - Corsair CMPSU 750TX - HAF 932 - Hanns-G 281DPB @ 1900x1200
Reply to chunkymonster
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > General Storage > Moore's Law and Hard Drive Failure
Go to:

There are 1153 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 vianescute won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 meywd won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 nayega won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 gpfear won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 Conrad925 won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 skythra won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 Ckaz won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 james59 won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 snarl won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 patlabor44 won the Uniformed badge