Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Intel Graphics Media Accelerator

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Intel Graphics Media Accelerator

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Anyone know anything about the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator? Does it compare to any video card and if so, what card would be an approximate comparison? I'm seeing some Quad core, 3-GB-of-ram machines for $800, but warranty is voided if you add a graphics card or video card. They say the on-boards are excellent, but I'm skeptical. Thanks.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

On board graphics sux, period. Unless you don't care about gaming. The GMA ranks below the nVidia GeForce 6100.

Who's telling you that adding a video card will void the warranty? Whoever they are, their business license should be voided.

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP

Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx
- 0 +

Maybe an ATI 9200 or nvidia 6200/5200 depend it's GMA 950 or GMA 3000/X3000/3100. Currently all of them don't have hardware vertex shader support so all of them can't run games that specific check for that (so they are worse in that aspect compare to the real cards I listed above). Intel will release a newer driver that support HW vertex shader on GMA X3000 (965G) and G35, but there's a news on digitimes states even with that they still won't work well with some games. They're good enough to do other things beside gaming though IMO.

EDIT: You can use 3DAnalyze to trick any game that wants HW vertex shader to run but whether the game run good or not is up to heaven.


Message edited by thuan on 07-31-2007 at 06:24:40 AM
Reply to thuan
- 0 +

Well I once was addicted to Call of Duty 2 (which is one the game that DOESN'T work), but this PC is primarily for video editing....

Reply to cruzian

For video editing any solution will work. If you are adding transitions and particles effects for fading then certain effects will utilize the video card. In those cases a dedicated video card can help with the effects, but other than that you will not see any performance improvements.

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP

Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx

Great, I just ordered a DELL Inspiron 530 Intel Core2 processor Q6600 (2.40Ghz 1066FSB) w/Quad Core Technology and 8MB cache. I decided to go with the on-board Integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3100. I do a lot of video editing from my camcorder to burn movies, etc, but other than that I dont play any games.

Can anybody tell me if there will be an advantage to getting a good PCIx card if I am going to use the Adobe Premiere Pro?

Reply to markivmariaj
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Intel Graphics Media Accelerator
Go to:

There are 986 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them