I want to upgrade to 2GB, and I can either buy another stick of the same, or get a "faster" stick of PC2-5300. I know that the PC2-5300 will drop down speed to match the PC2-4200, so considering that they cost the same for me to upgrade, which would be better? The PC2-4200 says it has a CAS latency of 4 clock cycles whereas the PC2-5300 has a latency of 5. Since it will be falling back to the PC2-4200 speeds, does this mean it may even be slower?
The only other real reason I can see to buy the PC2-5300 stick is if I upgrade my laptop later and re-use the PC2-5300 stick in its full capacity.
Alternatively, I suppose I could buy a 2GB stick of the PC2-5300, but I don't know if it would be worth while as the current 1GB stick would then be obsolete?
The processor is a Pentium M 760 2GHz (133Mhz clock/bus speed according to CPU-Z and 532MHz rated FSB) Thanks!
Edit: Does anyone know IF I did buy a 2GB stick of the PC2-5300, whether my laptop would be compatible with it (the specs say max 2gb but it sort of implies that it is max 2 X 1GB sticks) or if the laptop would even be able to run the faster speeds ? (or would I have to phone IBM to find out)
Message edited by infernooo on 08-02-2007 at 01:26:57 PM
Your manual or the manufacturer's website will tell you if the pc5300 is compatible..... would be surprised if it wasn't. I don't think you'll notice any difference in speed between the two speeds of ram, the quantity is what will give you a noticeable difference. If you run the 5300 at 4200 speed you may be able to lower the latency to 4 depending on the bios settings you have access to, but personally I'd just get the pc4200.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.