Insofar as I know the 128MB DDR3 is significantly faster than the DDR2 - it's comparable directly to the 6600GT. The larger framebuffer on the DDR2 is pointless because the card won't be able to play anything with texture sizes that big at any satisfactory speed anyway.
If I remember correctly, the DDR2 is 667Mhz effective while the DDR3 is generally about 1333-1400Mhz effective
Message edited by lancer_3k on 08-01-2007 at 11:00:21 AM
And it definitely kills the 7300GT DDR2 when the texture size fits in the framebuffer - which would likely be the case anyway if you wanted playable framerates...
IMHO there's really not any reason to consider a 7300 GT at the price they are at right now.
The difference between it and a 7600 GT or even a 8600 GT is basically the cost of ONE game (if that in some cases). Trade that for many months of much better gaming.
My guess is the OP is from outside the US where the prices may not be as competitive as they are here.
It's a well known fact that the DDR3 7300GT is leaps and bounds better than the DDR2 version. If you can find one cheaper than a DDR2 7600GS, then go for it. Otherwise just get the DDR2 7600GS.
------------------------------I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates who said, "I drank what?"[/Chris Knight]
You know what ole Jack Burton says at a time like this? Ole Jack says...what the hell[/Jack Burton]
The 7600gs 256 ddr2 is the card I'm using in my HPTC and for 40 buks shipped to my house(fleabay) I have to say I'm fairly impressed...the 7300gt is getting all the hype but its the same instance as the 1950 pro(which is a great bang for the clams)...jus my 2 cents...gl
I agree- get the 7600 if you can afford it. But if you can't, keep this in mind:
I had to use a 7300GT DDR2 while my main card was in the shop and it overclocks very well. The defaults are 350 core, 666 RAM. I had it running 475/1000 stable, which I thought was impressive.
So at lower resolutions like 800 x 600 and 1024 x 768 , the 128 mb ddr3 would be doing better than the 256 mb ddr2.....yes at those resolutions 128 mb is enough..... so having more ram helps in playing at higher resolution......like at 1280 x 968 with 256 mb .....but with 7300 gt.....even 256 mb it is still a 7300 gt......and would give good performance by that reso.....
nshady, there has to be better choices out there. What's your resolution, what's your favourite game, how much money can you spend on the video card, what kind of video card can you use (PCI-E?), what kind of PSU do you have?
Something like 7900GS or x1950Pro or x1950xt would be MUCH better than the 7300 cards.
Actually , getting it for a cybercafe so it's quite a lot....and the worse thing that I'm getting VGA for AGP. So, cant really spend on better cards..... Price for AGP 128 mb ddr3 7300 GT is about 95 USD. Well , If It's PCI-E then different story...
Even the AGP is out of my budget....but i would fork out somemore money just to get the 7300 GT. I would have gotten 7600 GS if all my mobo has a PCI-E for VGA.
It will be used for Samsung Syncmaster 750 S 17 Inches CRT monitor....It's for games like Fifa 2007, Battlefield 2142, Company Of Heroes, CnC Tiberium Wars.
I believe It is enough for resolutions at 1024x768 at HIGH setting.
Actually , getting it for a cybercafe so it's quite a lot....and the worse thing that I'm getting VGA for AGP. So, cant really spend on better cards..... Price for AGP 128 mb ddr3 7300 GT is about 95 USD. Well , If It's PCI-E then different story...
Even the AGP is out of my budget....but i would fork out somemore money just to get the 7300 GT. I would have gotten 7600 GS if all my mobo has a PCI-E for VGA.
It will be used for Samsung Syncmaster 750 S 17 Inches CRT monitor....It's for games like Fifa 2007, Battlefield 2142, Company Of Heroes, CnC Tiberium Wars.
I believe It is enough for resolutions at 1024x768 at HIGH setting.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.