1066 linked or 1142 linked with adjusted CPU speed?

What is better for games? (Not number tests, Sandra etc.)

  • CPU 2.93, 1066 LINKED

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • CPU 2.88, 1142 LINKED

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other...comments welcome.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

zooairz

Distinguished
Nov 18, 2006
83
0
18,630
What is better for games? (Not number tests, Sandra etc.)
1- CPU 2.93, 1066 LINKED
2- CPU 2.88, 1142 LINKED
3- Other, comments welcome.

System:
qx6700
2 Gb of OCZ
evga 680i mobo
8800 gtx sli
other junk...
winxp pro -32bit

I do a good bit of multimedia processing (movies, pics, etc.) but wanted to know what is better for games?

Thanks to all.
 

GijsJUH

Distinguished
Feb 16, 2007
28
0
18,530
testmetsnelheid.png


As you can see, there isn't much diffirence at al between 533 MHz and 1066 MHz... But, when I turn up the CPU speed, I get about 5 FPS more. So, if I were you, I would go with the higher clock speed on the CPU, and not the RAM... 1066 is fast enough.
 

zooairz

Distinguished
Nov 18, 2006
83
0
18,630
Dude,

Nice chart. I have no objective data, such as yours, to prove my point (to myself) that the higher clock speed is better for the game end user experience. I believe that it is as well, and appreciate your chart.

Thanks for your thoughts and have a good one!